Talk:Radoje Pajović/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 20:53, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

All looks pretty good.


 * "figures, who" Delete the comma
 * "a politically motivated, popular trend in historiography" -> "a politically-motivated popular trend in historiography"

I made a change to suppress a warning. Hawkeye7  (discuss)  20:53, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * "He accused the same groups of historical revisionism against the anti-fascist struggle in Montenegro and its legacy." It is unclear who is referred to, and what are the "same groups"? There is an ambiguity between Amfilohije and Pajović.
 * Thanks for taking a look, ! All done. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Looks good
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Looks good
 * Looks good