Talk:Rage-baiting

Created page from sandbox
This page was created from the user's sandbox The full history of its development can be found there. I had also considered creating the page "rage click" instead of rage farm. Oceanflynn (talk) 22:45, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Shorter lead needed
The WP:LEAD is much too long in proportion to the overall length of the article. Sometimes big articles like History of France where most of the content is generally well-organised and not too controversial can justify long leads, but that is not the case here. Redoing the lead will first require a thorough reading through the whole content, which mostly looks well-sourced. My suggestion for someone with the time to do this: Boud (talk) 01:45, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
 * shift most of paragraphs 2, 3, 4 of the current lead to the body of the article, possibly as brief, complementary sections or subsections;
 * consider re-organising some of the existing section/subsection structure ("Examples" sounds a bit anecdotic);
 * then re-check the lead to see if it's a fair summary, roughly matching the sections and summarising them.

Better citations
Citations on the article are all over the place. Tried cleaning them up but I'm not entirely sure about what is entirely necessary to keep on the page. Aisterion (talk) 11:35, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Biased article
This article makes it seem as though only right wing news outlets participate in rage bait when in reality it's done all across the political spectrum. Just another example of left wing bias on Wikipedia. 2605:A601:AC39:1200:7DCB:CBC0:BA2E:6E36 (talk) 16:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: ENGL 1301
— Assignment last updated by LC1061 (talk) 17:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)