Talk:Raggs Kids Club Band

Untitled
this is written like a big advertisement.

what about the pull-out from local shopping malls, leaving the kids club programs to die slow deaths?

why the computer animation changeover? what caused it? any why won't anybody come out and say what the RAGGS acronym stands for (Retailers And _ _ _, as I recall - I'll have to make an edit!)...

c'mon. 72.131.74.138 00:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)anonynonynonymous
 * I agree with 72.131.74.138 that much of this is written like an advertisement. Some sections such as "About the television show" are word for word the same as the pdf files found at http://www.raggs.com/USA/grownups.html. Is this copy-vio or does the words "Press Releases" imply copy-left? R00m c (talk) 08:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

No mention of B.Max being in a wheelchair (in the TV show anyway). This article needs a big cleanup. Alexlaw65 (talk) 01:31, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree it needs cleanup, but it seems a little rediculous to threaten to delete it because it isn't "notable". I'm online trying to find the studio location, which I couldn't really tell from the article, but deleting the thing isn't the solution. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.105.118.69 (talk) 03:17, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

There's FAR too much work to be done to this page to bring this up to any sort of standard. The layout is terrible, just chunk after chunk of unreferenced content. This is obviously designed as a advertising page for people searching for this band. It has been over 3 and a half years since a contributor first suggested changes so I have marked this page for the appropriate clean-ups required. I'll check back in two months, if nothings been done I'll mark it for deletionBossbuild (talk) 16:18, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Unauthorized copypaste?
The "Characters" section appears to be a copypaste from http://www.raggs.com/stations/pdf/Raggs%20Character%20Bios.pdf The content was added by Rkcband, whose username suggests a possible connection with the subject. But even if Rkcband owned the copyright on the copypasted material, I see no evidence that they ever properly released it properly for Wikipedia's use. Anyone know of any reason why that section should not be deleted or reverted to a prior version on grounds of WP:COPYVIO? AtticusX (talk) 11:26, 14 December 2012 (UTC)