Talk:Raid on Dartmouth (1749)

Deletion of Controversy Section
The following discussion is taken from the edit page:


 * 1) Controversy:  This is not factual information. It is the personal opinion of someone who is not an academic, is openly biased and is not qualified to offer a professional opinion on the topic)
 * 2) rv blatantly white supremacist whitewashing of a historian who has extensively exposed the "attitude" that only white males are allowed opinions on this matter)
 * 3) Controversy:  Personal opinion of a person who is not an accredited historian. Comments not supported by period documents or other historical evidence.)
 * 4) Removal of content without any other reason than a snarky edit summary
 * 5) Not based on evidence. Dartmouth massacre clear example of Micmac attacking unarmed civilians.)
 * 6) reverted blanking to last revision by Skamecrazy123)
 * 7) (this is world-famous as the white supremacist modus operandi. Virulently fearful of debate they know they will lose so instead they send in a "sneak" to silently muzzle any dissenting voice without discussion)
 * 8) (Contains hate speech)
 * 9) (rv racial agenda vandal, edit warring to suppress balanced pov article with viewpoint of Mikmaq historian Daniel N Paul)
 * 10) (Removed content peddling conspiracy theories as historical fact)
 * 11) (revert edit warring IP. Your undiscussed blanking of cited content has been noticed so you will continue to be reverted...)
 * 12) (RV racist)
 * 13) (Section appears to be well-sourced and relevant. Discuss proposed removal on talk page.)
 * 1) (Contains hate speech)
 * 2) (rv racial agenda vandal, edit warring to suppress balanced pov article with viewpoint of Mikmaq historian Daniel N Paul)
 * 3) (Removed content peddling conspiracy theories as historical fact)
 * 4) (revert edit warring IP. Your undiscussed blanking of cited content has been noticed so you will continue to be reverted...)
 * 5) (RV racist)
 * 6) (Section appears to be well-sourced and relevant. Discuss proposed removal on talk page.)
 * 1) (revert edit warring IP. Your undiscussed blanking of cited content has been noticed so you will continue to be reverted...)
 * 2) (RV racist)
 * 3) (Section appears to be well-sourced and relevant. Discuss proposed removal on talk page.)
 * 1) (RV racist)
 * 2) (Section appears to be well-sourced and relevant. Discuss proposed removal on talk page.)
 * 1) (Section appears to be well-sourced and relevant. Discuss proposed removal on talk page.)