Talk:Raising Sand

Fair use rationale for Image:Raising Sand.jpg
Image:Raising Sand.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:26, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:RaisingSandCover.jpg
Image:RaisingSandCover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Observation
These are quallity tunes, every point in record making is hit very well, but (t.i.a.a.b [there is always a but]) I really do not hear Robert Plant as himself; e.g. his recognizable sound from years of great exposures and, for him, the ability to be beefy to sorrowful, although affectation of sounds seemed to creep up in the later days of LZ. I have heard RP sing tunes of these sentiments in the past, but those here seemed to have been too carefully mixed into the mix. Cisum.ili.dilm (talk) 15:06, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Background
Can anyone add more information to the "Background" section that states how this strange collaboration started? --Gak (talk) 15:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Robert Christgau link
The Robert Christgau link goes to the wrong album I found a working link, but it doesn't fit the format of the template. KingAlanI (talk) 13:19, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 one external links on Raising Sand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071228114855/http://www.pastemagazine.com:80/action/article/5842/review/music/raising_sand to http://www.pastemagazine.com/action/article/5842/review/music/raising_sand
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071020093523/http://www.rollingstone.com:80/reviews/album/16272721/review/16928089/raising_sand to http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/album/16272721/review/16928089/raising_sand
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100119010448/http://blog.rhapsody.com:80/2009/11/countdec.html? to http://blog.rhapsody.com/2009/11/countdec.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 20:11, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 9 one external links on Raising Sand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080103094713/http://www.blender.com:80/guide/reviews.aspx?id=4789 to http://www.blender.com/guide/reviews.aspx?id=4789
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080506235552/http://www.bbc.co.uk:80/music/release/rwcz/? to http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/release/rwcz/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080302233133/http://www.billboard.com:80/bbcom/content_display/reviews/albums/e3i7b7f6bee78014d179aa335893eb31341 to http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/content_display/reviews/albums/e3i7b7f6bee78014d179aa335893eb31341
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071215233636/http://www.rollingstone.com:80/news/story/17601363/the_100_best_songs_of_2007/13 to http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/17601363/the_100_best_songs_of_2007/13
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081205000233/http://content.grammy.com/grammy_awards/51st_show/list.aspx to http://content.grammy.com/grammy_awards/51st_show/list.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100731012250/http://blog.rhapsody.com:80/2010/02/great-covers-albums.html to http://blog.rhapsody.com/2010/02/great-covers-albums.html
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5wxD8HhA9 to http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120216065652/http://www.ifpi.se/wp/wp-content/uploads/guld-platina-20082.pdf to http://www.ifpi.se/wp/wp-content/uploads/guld-platina-20082.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080131173336/http://www.shorefire.com:80/clients/plantkrauss/ to http://shorefire.com/clients/plantkrauss/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 07:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Should there be a separate article for Gone Gone Gone?
According to Wikipedia's notability guidelines for music (WP:NSONG), a song may be notable if it: 1. Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts. (Note again that this indicates only that a song may be notable, not that it is notable.) 2. Has won one or more significant awards or honors, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award. 3. Has been independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands, or groups.

The Krauss-Plant version of "Gone Gone Gone" won the Grammy Award for Best Pop Collaboration with Vocals, and it seems to have hit #2 on the "Triple A" (Adult Alternative Songs) chart (see ). And then there was also the original recording by the Everly Brothers on Gone Gone Gone (album).

I haven't looked in depth to see what good secondary sources there are for this song, but first I am curious whether editors who may be more familiar with this material have thoughts about whether this song warrants a standalone article. --EightYearBreak (talk) 15:19, 13 August 2019 (UTC)