Talk:Rajputs in Bihar/Archive 2

Qualifier
Ranabir Samaddar is a (very reputed) political scientist, which ought be the qualifier. TrangaBellam (talk) 12:45, 1 June 2022 (UTC)


 * That being said, Rajput violence —both sexual and non-sexual— on LC laborers etc. was not limited to a few villages; they were the rule of the day. And scholarship detailing such violence is in abundance. TrangaBellam (talk) 12:47, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * If I am not wrong, Chatarji (1992: OUP) has a definitive essay on this. TrangaBellam (talk) 12:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * TrangaBellam (talk) 12:56, 1 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Dear, I was not denying the misconduct part on the part of Rajput Landlords but my point was in context to use example which only describes of particular village and extrapolating it to whole community. Secondly, can this whole page be filled just with it like the way it has been done. Akalanka820 (talk) 13:05, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * This article is short and may be we can add more thing like their culture and tradition, but what you are saying about some sourced content being WP:RELNOT is not correct actually. Since, these are not incidents, like in case of Delhi rape case (Nirbhaya incident), these are part and parcel of feudal society, in which Rajput community was at top. So,don't try to personally decide what should be there and what shouldn't be there. I agree with about the authenticity of sources.Admantine123 (talk) 13:16, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Please understand my points are related to the two cases that I discussed in last two days and they were definitely incidents of caste violence related to Anwa and Berath village respectively as per the reference where the perpetrators caste was Rajputs. I would request you to stick to the issue that I had raised it was in respect to that cases. I am not contesting the general misconduct part but if there are better pages like we do have here in Caste-related violence in India available then those content should be added there and a para on "general misconduct" should be added on Rajputs in Bihar page. But not great to bombarding this page with regular examples and don't forget two times the content have not exactly matched with the reference as I had pointed out, so definitely it becomes a case of more than just improving the article. Secondly, no tit for tat responses. You gave your response, I have put it. Akalanka820 (talk) 13:24, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Dear Akalanka, these incidents just describe the situation that prevailed in feudal society. There may be more instances as claimed by other sources, but the author recorded these two only in order to give example. I agree that this article should have more things on community but this can't be excuse for removal of sourced content. You may add more things like "Rajputs of Bihar developed an art form called Pari Khanda'''" and similar things related to Culture, diet, tradition. But, since the lead itself says they form apex of feudal society, this description of sexual misconduct is justified. Admantine123 (talk) 13:30, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Please be careful after last two cases where content added by you were twisted and not exactly matching the reference. Still, you have kept on coming with similar biased statements. Rest I again repeat that I am not denying the general misconduct on the part of certain Rajput Landlords but this was in no different to Bhumihar Landlords or even Jat Landholders of Haryana ( example Mirchpur violence). But we don't add such "generalisation" part on other community pages. I can understand if your point was only about adding general misconduct of the Landlords of this group. This is fine, I support it but adding case study of one or two village and extrapolating here when we have proper pages like Caste-related violence in India for it is not a very good justification. This is my last response to it. Now, I would request to not get into tit for tat here to deviate this discussion.￼ Akalanka820 (talk) 13:43, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

I would say just one thing that, if it exists for Jat and Bhumihars, you may add it there too. But, don't make it an excuse to remove it as many sources support the misconduct. And, you have already modified the content and have added the particular village, the case of which was documented by the author, so nothing more exist to rectify further. None of us have disagreement with the recent edits of yours. In WP:Goodfaith, i may advise that you may search into the book of "Sanjay Kumar" and mention their political achievement before the "Mandal Era", if you think that present version is casting wrong impression about the community. Also, your point of we generalising it for whole community is WP:OR, we should stick to source and source themselves say "Rajputs" were engaged not particular proportion of Rajput community was engaged. Thanks Admantine123 (talk) 13:58, 1 June 2022 (UTC)


 * You say: we should stick to source and source themselves say "Rajputs" were engaged not particular proportion of Rajput community was engaged. then why you didn't stick to the source when you had inserted it. I would better suggest please follow your own words. And for your information, the two particular reference I have talked about in the above cases described situation in two village Anwa ( Ranabir Sammaddar) and Berath ( Case study). So, sorry those cannot be used to generalise a group and in my view there description should be added on Caste-related violence in India which is the best page for it as it deals with those village. For the general misconduct part by Rajput Landlords, it should be there by using the already mentioned other references. This is the simple point I made, I don't know what is the problem here, I am not asking for any removal of the general misconduct part just asked for moving the two cases to a relevant page. Akalanka820 (talk) 14:44, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Probably, i didn't see the last page that time, that it was written in context of a particular village. But, when it was removed, i didn't object too. Now, that problem is not existing here, i have clarified that this particular content talks specifically about Rajputs and it's related to day to day affair of feudal society of Bihar. Hence, can't be added on caste related violence as they talk about particular incidents, which are not connected to any "social practice". Second thing, you may scroll "n" number of sources about post independence history of Bihar, you will find that caste wars, sexual misconduct, caste army were not individual tragic phenomenon but a practice rooted in social order.This is something, different from the condition of Uttar Pradesh and other North Indian state. Any good book on post independence history of Bihar will show you the things that are mentioned right now in article and we can't avoid such thing which have lot of sources as TrangaBellam stated.For more knowledge on this, you may go through other sources like Life as Dalit which also focuses on rural society of Bihar in Zamindari period, you will find that this was a practice, not any incident, thanks.Admantine123 (talk) 15:57, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, the request of mentioning these two references to "caste related violence" appears to be WP:GAMING behaviour, as it isn't talking about any violence, just mentions social practice for a particular village as case study and someone will remove that too from that article on many grounds. And from here also it will be removed, so despite having a source from reputed agency like "United Nations" and reputed writer like "Ranbir Sammadar" battle of words and Personal opinion by someone will make it difficult to keep sourced material in an article. I would request you to not engage in removing things, just for the reason that it appears "objectionable" to you. Rather, you may expand the article with adding more content in other areas like politics and tradition of the community. Admantine123 (talk) 16:05, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry, this is not gaming as the content that you had added failed the reference and in way this isn't directly connected but only indirectly. On the other hand there is a case of continuous deception by misquoting references on multiple pages which should be WP:GAMING here. All of these cases of misquoting of sources is a more serious matter. Akalanka820 (talk) 16:43, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * In my opinion, I have been very generous in not taking this continuous content failing the reference and that too on a very contentious subject like caste/community. Akalanka820 (talk) 16:45, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

You are talking about those articles, which i edited long ago, and after that edits by many other users and bots have moved the linked page here and there, also you are finding mistakes in my 12000+ edits, which i have done in past two years and if me or anyone else will do the same for other editors, they will also find a lot of mistakes like this. If i contest or revert your "minor corrections" then only you can claim that i am being disruptive. Also, editors are not aware of all the sources they are using in an article, nobody have actually read every page of every source they are using in an article. Our knowledge mainly relies on one or two sources but we add other sources too in order to solidify what we have added.Hence, i would request to not club all these things together, i clarified that i didn't see that it was a case of particular village was on another page, but after rectification it's fine. Moving the content can not be supported as it's not an "incident" but a phenomenon common in Zamindari period and it deserves mention on the page. If you have Sources, which are taking in opposite way, you may present, battle of words is not a solution.Thanks.Admantine123 (talk) 04:52, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Please, present source to proove that Dola Pratha was not in existence and for the other things too, which you are contradicting on the basis of your own opinion. And, if i challenge your rectification of some of my edits, which were done long ago, then only claim of me being disruptive. Don't keep that thing again and again from now onwards.Admantine123 (talk) 05:11, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Lastly, Akalanka820 many things on many articles also appears controversial to me, but i don't become admant in removing that, if it is sourced properly. You may understand this. In the above two thread, and  have also talked against this citing their own reason, so i will request you to move forward and if you have any source, which contradict what's mentioned here, you may add the opposite view of other authors too, which is the best thing for such contested part.Rather than outright removal, Thanks.Admantine123 (talk) 16:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Nobody is asking for removal but moving the two case content of a particular village to a relevant page here Caste-related violence in India. I don't know how my points have been contradicted. Akalanka820 (talk) 16:36, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Your content on multiple pages had been found misquoted, I had to correct the same and that too on a Caste related pages which is under strict rules. In all these pages you have been continuously active till recently so no excuses. It is better you look at your  own conduct rather than coming up with such responses. And for your points on  dola Pratha it is you who need to coming up with references where it explicitly mentions that this community practiced it rather than misquoting a case study of one Anwa village to extrapolate it to the whole community when the writer himself says Hajipur village conduct was fine. I again repeat what I have said here that I am asking for moving of the two studies related to particular village to a more relevant page like Caste-related violence in India. It is either you don't understand what I have said or deliberately trying to deviate from it. This continuous similar responses might force me to take all this up further. Tagging other experienced editors as well like ￼ Akalanka820 (talk) 07:16, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * This is another case [] related to an another community written in the wake of rape crimes against 19 women in Haryana. I want to ask experts like Dear u|Kautilya3, should such report be mentioned on those community pages or on relevant page like Caste-related violence in India. Here the written work has even done generalisation like calling out the whole community in a state rather than only village. Akalanka820 (talk) 07:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Present source also mention Rajput directly, if you have anything against it present your WP:SOURCES to counter it. .Admantine123 (talk) 08:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I am understanding what you are saying, but these are not particular incidents, these are case study for a prevalent phenomenon in villages, committed by Rajputs. It's clearly mentioned in source. Hence, the most relevant page for that case study is this page only. Admantine123 (talk) 08:08, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * My dear editor, the two are particular incidents as per the content of reference that said I am not contesting the general misconduct part of the landlords related to the community. I am sure this is simple to understand from my first comment itself, I request for no regular replies here, it is getting on the same track. Akalanka820 (talk) 08:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The two case study of Anwa and Berath village that I am talking about here mentioned Rajput landlords of particular village and not the whole community in Bihar. I again for the last time repeat, I am talking about the two cases. The content to it should be on an other relevant page and not here. Akalanka820 (talk) 08:10, 3 June 2022 (UTC)￼
 * , the sources presented with quotes, were also saying that this sexual conduct related issues were present in whole Bihar not in a particular village. These case studies are just examples for that also  has also stated the same thing that there exist wide coverage regarding Rajputs being involved in such conduct.`This is what he said: That being said, Rajput violence —both sexual and non-sexual— on LC laborers etc. was not limited to a few villages; they were the rule of the day. And scholarship detailing such violence is in abundance. You are wasting time of others while continuosly repeating same thing.Admantine123 (talk) 08:13, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * You cannot extrapolate to have your own WP:OR, what matters is that particular references. The two case studies are definitely related to particular village as the quote suggested and for the last part I am repeating the general misconduct part of the landlords related to this community can remain but then there are such references for other groups as well and it needs a general discussion of its own. This is the last reply here to the two cases. Akalanka820 (talk) 08:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * For dear TB, I think he might have thought that I am asking for removal of general misconduct part. The answer to it is no. I have only raised about the two case studies of two villages why it should be here? but not on a much better relevant page. Akalanka820 (talk) 08:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I would request for you to stop repeating the same thing again. Same applies to me as well. The points have been made and now I hope you must have understood my point is wrt two cases of village. Akalanka820 (talk) 08:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Kunwar Singh belonged to Bhojpur and the princely states were also few in Bihar, yet we are mentioning them in detail here. Rajput are in millions, these people don't represent all of them. Yet we have covered them as they are part of larger Rajput community. The Rajputs of these two villages also belong to Rajput community, '''so why should we mention only "good things" and skip "controversial things" on the basis of our judgement for the similar type of case.Admantine123 (talk) 08:25, 3 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Please don't come up with some kind of whataboutery and stick to the topic. Your disgust for this social group is known in a comment on a talk page and there has been regular errors with respect to your content here not matching the reference. Please, don't force me to take this matter up. Akalanka820 (talk) 08:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

, the text can be on both articles(this and caste violence page). It is not a single incident but a pattern or custom. The name of the villages are explicitly mentioned hence there is no extrapolation. Thanks, LukeEmily (talk) 21:52, 6 June 2022 (UTC)


 * no, there is a reason why we have pages like Caste-related violence in India, we cannot just put individual village incident to do generalisation of a community. Even here in one of those village report, Hajipur village conduct was fine which just proves that this was a general landlord problem be it Rajput, Bhumihar, or Jat Landholders. I have the reports like this [] and more for Haryana specifically mentioning a group in the wake of rape of 19 women in Haryana. Similar, cases forany groups. I can share those links here but In my opinion, Jat page or any other community page is not the right page to mention those thing., you may not like or have a favourable view of this social group but it is better to avoid generalisation of any community unless they are explicitly named without Landlords or specific village. pinging a lot of esteemed experts in this field, , Sir. It would be very helpful if you guys can share your opinion here. Please do go through these two discussion:[], [] as well. This should be a larger debate as to whether we are going to do generalisation of any social group based on the misconduct of their Landlords because such reports are there for landlords of most social groups. Akalanka820 (talk) 04:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Second issue should be if we add general misconduct here then are we also going to mention some individual cases of village? , like it has done here. In my opinion this is a complete generalisation of a community when in fact the conduct in question is of certain landlords. Pinging, , , etc Akalanka820 (talk) 04:46, 7 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment - Responding to various pings, but without doing a thorough study of anything. We have already talked about the inadmissibility of WP:SYNTHESIS. That would seem to apply to any idea of generalising material from landlords to all Rajputs, or for specialising material from all upper castes to Rajputs. All forms of SYNTHESIS are to be avoided.
 * On the other hand, I don't agree with the argument that some material can go in other pages and so it should be removed from here. Content for each topic should be decided based on the appropriateness for that topic. Detail can be pruned of course, if it can be found on other pages. Links like and  can be used to point the readers to the more detailed pages. I hope this helps. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Sources which LukeEmily put are saying Rajputs not Rajput landlords''', if it has been the case, i would have supported it's movement to Zamindars of Bihar. Also, caste based Senas and other things that characterized the period of 1990s in Bihar, was not specific to some members any community. It was applicable to whole community. No WP:SYNTHESIS here and i think Akalanka is talking only about these two case studies not the sexual misconduct part, which is not for "any particular village". Admantine123 (talk) 11:44, 7 June 2022 (UTC)


 * this reference does mention landlords, Whereas I do agree the other Franco reference doesn't uses Landlords. I raised two points as you can see there. The case study is second point I had raised above. The sexual misconduct part also I did raised as such reports of misconduct are also present for landlords of many groups not specific to one, so why the generalisation being done here on this page. I did mention a link of similar report ( even more scathing content) on Haryana related to a social group. Lastly, I and you , had a lots of discussion on it with no conclusion. I would request let those who were pinged give their reply and we both keep some patience for now. Akalanka820 (talk) 12:05, 7 June 2022 (UTC)


 * , Even if they were or were not all landlords, the sources also specifically mention their caste. And many of Bihar Rajputs were landlords anyway. It can be on Bihar landlords page as well. The "Breast pinching", as per the source, is not single caste specific(it only says upper caste) so it does not belong to this page but can be added to the landlords page where the upper castes are mentioned. The dola pratha etc. was not a single incident with 1-2 people involved. To illustrate my point, here is an example of caste related violence that is NOT suitable for a Rajput or Rajasthani Rajput caste page because it is a single incident involving 1 victim. But it may be suitable for Dalit or caste violence pages. Giving a quote from Chakravarti.

Now, the above cannot be added to a caste page because it is a single incident. I have checked other pages and caste based major incidents are mentioned on multiple pages. Don't see any reason for removing from this page especially as it involves multiple victims and the crime seems to be caste specific, otherwise the source would have just said upper caste (implying 4 castes in Bihar) or only all-caste landlords(implying it was not caste specific). It seems that Brahmins did not engage in such pervert actions. It would be a good study as to why the difference in the communities - perhaps because Brahmins were more educated.LukeEmily (talk) 22:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)


 * , please have a balanced approach on caste pages. FYI, in the two references it says Landlords of "Rajputs and Bhumihars", this was mostly a Landlord or any dominant caste problem. I have explained you above either you don't understand this or is just unwilling to. More scathing remarks are on a social group of Haryana. I have shared one reference and have more to it. Akalanka820 (talk) 06:31, 12 June 2022 (UTC)


 * "upper caste (implying 4 castes in Bihar) or only all-caste landlords(implying it was not caste specific). It seems that Brahmins did not engage in such pervert actions. It would be a good study as to why the difference in the communities." - your own references does mention Bhumihar as well. Brahmins didn't had many landholders in the numbers of others. Do t try to show your personal  disgust for a social group here to have your point here. Akalanka820 (talk) 06:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)


 * , this is what the first reference on the page says: In a survey conducted in a few villages in Bhojpur, rape of lower caste women from Musahar and Chamar caste, by the Rajput and Bhumihar landlords was a major cause of anguish until Naxalism emerged on the scene. . Atleast read before commenting anything. You have already made your opinion and in one of the cases I highlighted you or your friendly editor added their own words as well. I left it didn't took it up. Akalanka820 (talk) 06:37, 12 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The dola pratha reference is only available for Anwa village. You always shout here WP:STICKTOSOURCE, and for your info none of it is any special and different to landlords of any community doing violence against Dalits or others. So, why it should be here? Just to fulfill a particular opinion of 2 editors against a group. I have shared the reference for Haryana. I will take this matter up and highlight as to how the content fail the reference on this page. The whole game here seems to be not balanced approach to caste pages. Akalanka820 (talk) 06:41, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Here is one report [] related to a group in Haryana, similar cases available for others. It is not any unique Akalanka820 (talk) 06:53, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * One should be knowledgeable about history of a particular state before commenting. Those words added by LE were not personal opinion i would say. As Gail Omvedt says this. Here she highlights that the rape were one of the cause of Naxalism in Bhojpur region of Bihar. I have other sources too which specifically talks about a particular community involved in these undignified abuse upon Dalits. Almost all sources talks about involvement of this specific caste. I would request not to make personal comments on fellow editors about their leaning, ideology etc. And use sources to counter the other opinion.

Admantine123 (talk) 07:01, 12 June 2022 (UTC)


 * what has all this got to do with this page ? Here is another I am sharing from Haryana with respect to an other social group, these are not even landholders but whole community has been put under question. Here - [] Akalanka820 (talk) 07:05, 12 June 2022 (UTC)


 * FYI Naxal violence was not specific to any group. It had UCs vs working class struggle. UCs included Bhumihars and others as well. Even the two references for rape/violence you have added on this page doesn't mention Rajputs Landlords alone but with an another social group. Akalanka820 (talk) 07:08, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I do have decent knowledge about Bihar and I am not here to share my professional qualifications. Please don't try to act like you are the only important and only editor on Wikipedia. Read WP:YANI￼ Akalanka820 (talk) 07:10, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I just added this source as you were thinking that Naxalism has nothing to do with rapes and molestation and Luke has added his own words there. Many sources are there which explicitly tells that this particular community was engaged in these acts. Just two or three examples are added here otherwise i have sources on different form of atrocities they used to commit on Dalits. But, adding all those will definitely not be WP:REL. But, just two three examples are okay. Let me put one more quote about different form of atrocities they committed in another region in the feudal society of pre "land reform period".
 * This source specifically talks about "Thakur/Rajput". I have in my collection many reports and books from organization like Human Rights Watch which specifically talks about Rajputs engaged in these acts in different regions of Bihar, making it an affair of whole state. But, since we have added only two such examples, i have not brought other sources. I will definitely add those later on in other articles. Admantine123 (talk) 07:23, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Thakur is used by rajputs, bhumihars and even maithili brahmins, where does this quote say it was rajput thakur? Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 11:11, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * not that it should require a source to the editors involved here to know this, anyone else can check in this book. . . Another prominent example would be C P Thakur , the politician from bjp. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 11:18, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Thakur means landlord as per a simple google books search. It's other meaning when referring to deities is "God". For example, Lord Krishna is referred to as Thakurji by some people. Anyway, it is not really caste specific. Even some Nai(barber) caste people had Thakur last name - see Karpoori Thakur and Bhikhari Thakur. Thanks.LukeEmily (talk) 14:16, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Thakur means landlord as per a simple google books search. It's other meaning when referring to deities is "God". For example, Lord Krishna is referred to as Thakurji by some people. Anyway, it is not really caste specific. Even some Nai(barber) caste people had Thakur last name - see Karpoori Thakur and Bhikhari Thakur. Thanks.LukeEmily (talk) 14:16, 12 June 2022 (UTC)


 * the point is mistreatment of Dalit or various depressed groups is not any caste specific. Such reports are there for most communities who had historically access to land or have now access to landholding post democracy as proved from the shared links for a community in Haryana and their equation with SCs. Even the two references you have added has mentioned the Landlords of this group with an another community named "Bhumihar" not specifically them alone. I am not denying the misconduct part but it is not only specific to this community. So, why it should be here? when we already have better pages to explain all this in detail. It is mostly part of UCs or even dominant caste vs depressed class struggle in the state and even in the country. The other two examples are specific to village Anwa and Berath and in Anwa case as well the writer Ranbir Sammaddar mentions good conduct of Hajipur village which had landholders of same social group. For Dola pratha, you need to bring up a reference specifically saying it, that it was practiced by this community in the state of Bihar, not a case study of one village.Akalanka820 (talk) 07:24, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * See proper method to WP:INDENT the comments. I haven't added it to Bhumihar, because that article was written by someone else and i don't know where to put these things, so that the flow of article do not get destroyed. I would clarify, all these sources talks about only two social groups among all the upper caste group in Bihar, i.e Bhumihar and Rajput. No source says anything about Kayastha and Brahmin.Admantine123 (talk) 07:28, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * It is mostly part of UCs or even dominant caste vs depressed class struggle in the state and even in the country., For this i would say please go through some of the good books available on post independence history of Bihar to understand that caste wars, rapes, massacre are not incidents of violence only. All that is linked to history of post independence Bihar. And here the Rajput and Bhumihar were on one side quelling revolution of Dalits and Backward Castes. In this background, these incidents happened, which are appearing to you as the cases of specific places . Thanks.Admantine123 (talk) 07:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I do have my daily work, we don't get enough time, odd minor mistake with respect to WP:INDENT should not be an issue here. I would request not to make discussion too fast here. And for  Bhumihar page, I think as per the diff it was you who had added Sadashivan and Sachidanand reference on a controversial topic there? It seems that you have been active on that page. And surprisingly you were reverting my edit some days back on Jaitharia (Bhumihar) on the same issue giving very different reasons. And for report mentioning Bhumihar, rajputs etc, let me make it clear there are reports on OBC groups like Kurmi, Yadav mistreating Dalits as well. So, this problem seems to be with those had access to land or are having access to land post reforms. Lastly, I am not going to respond any further to it here especially to you and your friendly editor. Akalanka820 (talk) 07:53, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I shared a report on Jats of Haryana mistreating Dalits, please share a report properly depicting it not some few lines like X reporter to Y. Even again the lines you shared the magistrate says adding some before it. It is district magistrate saying some person. Please understand your own points what you share here before coming up with anything. You and your friendly editors disgusting views wrt some social groups has been expressed. It is better we both stop discussing because I don't think it is possible to reach consensus with those who have very entrenched negative opinions with respect to certain social groups and are too adamant with their points rather than believing in some give and take consensus. I think this matter will need attention of outside editors other than me, you and your friendly editor Luke. Akalanka820 (talk) 07:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The is no restriction to adding about the mistreatment of women/dalits on all pages where it is relevant. I have no objection if anyone adds it to the pages - Kurmi Yadav Bhumihar Jat etc. as long it is well sourced. We have to be very specific though. Think from a non-Hindu western person's or non-Indian point of view. If he or she reads the word Shudra etc. on a caste page, they will hardly give it much importance especially since the varna has been mobile and based on rituals. But sexual offenses are looked upon very seriously even by people who don't believe in religion/caste or are atheists. Unless the source specifically mentions Rajput we cannot assume that any upper caste or thakur(landlord) related crime mentioned was related to Rajput community. BTW, I don't have any disgust towards any community or race as suggested by another editor. Every person is different. Every community has good people and bad people.LukeEmily (talk) 14:32, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * :::: there is a difference! the important part is "relevant to the page" basically WP:RELNOT and all kinds of synthesis as pointed out by an uninvolved editor of such a possibility here. In my opinion I have already expressed there is a need for proper one report on this controversial topic that explicitly talks on this Bihar based social group alone (not along with Bhumihars or other UC and not only focused on certain landholders) like I shared about Haryana case dealing with Jats violence against Scheduled Castes here-[], here again [] where it talks about institutions having backing of Jats playing role in their favour, till the time we have such reports it is not great step to add on caste page, even if it fulfills the above points there is a need for larger discussion on it. Otherwise, why so many pages are being created and mostly related to such cases? Every such violence doesn't involve only caste angle, have multiple factors. And your point regarding source mentioning a "word" like "Rajput", in my opinion it doesn't mean anything in larger context. It is very important that we read the whole context before any two line quotes as in most cases I have found  that the reference are more dealing with general Landlord violence against depressed classes. So, in line with all this it becomes important that caste pages should be more balanced and not only a hit-job project especially on such a contentious thing. The references added here on the issue are either case study dealing with odd village or some lines from book talking about bad behaviour against depressed classes by certain (not all) Landlords related to this group (in this case: Bhumihars, Rajputs etc not only Rajput). I tried to search for a JSTOR report on such a topic related to Rajputs of Bihar as I was told this was very notable, but didn't found one. On the other hand I got two reports exclusively dealing with Jats of Haryana and their equation with Scheduled Castes. For your rest of the point, it is better action speaks more than the words unfortunately that doesn't seems the case here. Lastly, I will not respond any further to replies here, so better not tag me. I think the time to reach any consensus on the talk page is over as various sides already have their established viewpoint and doesn't look like a case of give and take consensus is ever possible between you, me and your friendly editor on this topic. We have passed that phase. I might take this matter up now at appropriate time to involve other editors for external inputs and for larger discussion. Right now, due to hectic work unable to do it. Akalanka820 (talk) 16:14, 12 June 2022 (UTC)


 * See WP:PASSIVE, calling us friendly editors and our edits as our disgust towards this specific community is not good. Article's talk pages are meant for discussion on content related to articles only and i have been providing sources for every edits. Moreover, all those things which seems "contentious" are not mine words. These are written in numerous sources, all of which converges on same conclusion. So, i am not the person who wrote these things about them. If there are ample sources saying same things, these should be here anyway. Thanks.Admantine123 (talk) 20:01, 12 June 2022 (UTC)


 * that is not how it works, as pointed out in other cases you just go through 2-3 lines to have your content. This has been the constant behaviour on many pages. I have even reverted on some, many times the content has also failed the reference which I corrected it. None of the references are explicitly based on a community but the context if we read is mostly Landlords vs depressed class pertaining to certain villages which is common theme in northern belt and not a community specific as such. This particular page deals with community, if this was notable we would have report on JSTOR like how I found for Jats in Haryana. I request you not to reply/ping me anymore. And for your  other points yes if you and only one editor on every page reply within hours it does create this impression ( I didn't said this in negative sense). This is not a one page case here. I have seen 4-5 pages even more than that, while on wiki same interest in certain case is okay but continuous instances does raises something. Lastly, I am requesting you as probably we have failed each other to convince on this case.  So, let us not come up continuously responding each other in a tit for tat. This may require larger discussion. Thank you. Akalanka820 (talk) 06:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC)


 * lastly, I didn't called your edits disgust but the views ( with respect to this group) which you had already expressed on an admin talk page. I have the diff for it. Akalanka820 (talk) 06:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC)


 * And last response ( apologies) just to clarify that  having disgust views is not some attack, it just means somebody can have particular belief to something which is definitely not positive wrt it. All people have all kinds of belief. But in my opinion and I hope it shouldn't get into editing (as beliefs can also get pushed into that direction and then it becomes problematic). Thanks Akalanka820 (talk) 06:32, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Article is becoming too spread out
At this point, this article looks less about rajputs in bihar and more about upper obc and other castes. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 21:47, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Finished my editing, included the role in 1857 revolution, which was last thing i wanted to add here. Other development in summarised format are covered as well, like the impact of naxalism on them. This is in perfect condition as of now. Thanks.Admantine123 (talk) 22:05, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

The dedication with which this article and the community has been maligned by some editors is a good example, shall be remembered. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 16:00, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Lord 0f Avernus, threats/personal attacks are not useful. They put an editor on the defensive. To defend himself/herself, in good faith, he/she looks for more material to support his/her edits. Hence it ends up having exactly opposite effects as more sources and material is found on the topic that is disputed. The best approach is to find content that says the opposite. Please assume good faith, and note that other editors also were pinged and those who responded agreed. No editor writes his own opinions. I do not agree with the "malign" comment as it implies that something false is said. There were some errors that were corrected. If you feel that any content is not appropriate or WP:OR, please comment on it. But I do agree with your first comment. This article does not look like an article about the Rajputs of Bihar. I do not know why Brahmins working as peons is relevant to the article. I also think given the short article, we should shorten the rape related issues and just put a summary in one or two lines. The rulers are mentioned in a list but I think there should be a small section discussing them (in short- in 1,2 lines per ruler). For example "medieval history". I agree with you that the article is unbalanced and after reading it end to end I don't feel I have learnt much about Bihar Rajputs. I think we should work on balancing it. Please take the initiative if you like. My concerns are (1)5 lines about rape are not appropriate for such a small article (2) The rulers should have a section instead of just a listing. (3) Too much information about OBC and other castes. (4)Also, there should be a small note somewhere that not only Rajputs but other castes were also involved in abuse of women.(listed on Bihar landlords page).LukeEmily (talk) 23:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)


 * And your statement: The dedication with which this article and the community has been maligned by some editors is a good example, shall be remembered. User:Lord 0f Avernus 16:00, 13 June 2022 (UTC) is a threat, see WP:WIAPA.LukeEmily (talk) 01:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Rajputs in Bihar
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Rajputs in Bihar's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Ahmad": From Paramara dynasty:  From Gajpati Ujjainia:  

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:47, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Related to the issue
As suggested here by ,[]. I am moving the above diff to the talk page of the article. Akalanka820 (talk) 12:36, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

, you can check this if it is fine? I have added two Oxford and Sharma's ref which are on similar lines. The other ones are not as clear, and case study, specific village part I have removed as suggested. Akalanka820 (talk) 12:59, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Its fine and acceptable but you have also removed Ranbir Sammadar, i can't create an article on "Dola Pratha", as the topic is not WP: Notable. Atleast, in your sentence, which you have added recently that landlords belonging to these caste were involved in sexual exploitation, you may mention which include practices like Dola Pratha with a one liner definition. I am saying this as recently through local newspaper in Bihar, i came to know about a lady who was regarded as living goddess in some region of Bihar.(She was first to attack this System as said in the report). Also, whole i was searching for some election related stuff i got this.

It indicates that it was prevalent in more regions. Lastly, new users have added lot of "forts". I saw and  removing them from Rajput article. We know in the community of millions, we have people from all socio-economic background and the forts are meant for princely state related to Rajputs only. Rest is fine. I hope i may work in other areas from now onwards, away from this article. Admantine123 (talk) 13:12, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Some more issues:
 * If Radha mohan singh has himself identified with this caste, no problem in adding him as per WP:BLP. But, he is a Bhartiya Janata Party leader. I doubt that he is also a part of "I am Hindu" rhetoric. :)).Admantine123 (talk) 13:18, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Individuals image shouldn't be there in caste articles- these are words of Sitush. One user has added Anugraha Narayan Singh here. We have never seen Lalu Prasad Yadav on Yadav page.
 * I can clarify, why i added Raghuvansh Prasad Singh there. I think it has motivated a fellow editor to add Radha Mohan Singh, but Raghuvansh Babu is no more, we need just a source calling him Rajput, not his own self-identification.Admantine123 (talk) 13:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC)


 * , do you have a reliable references for Dola pratha, because Sammaddar reference talks about it for a specific Anwa village, he also says Hajipur village had no such. If you have references for Dola pratha, I will add it because I am not able to find that in other references. For the forts part, let me look into it. I will correct some. Akalanka820 (talk) 13:26, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Currently, i am not searching anything related to that, so i don't have but can find. Admantine123 (talk) 13:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)


 * , as per the above the Wire reference you shared -, looks like practice was more common with Bhumihars. Akalanka820 (talk) 13:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay, yes. Agree. I saw Dola Pratha there, since no mention of Rajputs, let it be.Admantine123 (talk) 13:31, 15 June 2022 (UTC)


 * , I thought Upper Backward Class is not constitutional category but if it is no issue then. My aim was to avoid upper and lower in lead content. For other parts as suggested, I will change it.Akalanka820 (talk) 13:50, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, this is a problem and many people misunderstood this. I would like to know, have you read about recent drive by central government for sub-categorisation of OBCs. They appointed Justice G. Rohini Committee. Don't take it in any other way, i know you are from engineering background, so it's not a big deal if you haven't read. Bihar government in the premiership of Karpoori Thakur itself sub-categorised the OBCs. Here we have Annexure 2 and Annexure 1 and the cutoff of Lower Backwards are less compared to Upper Backwards. This is a statutory provision in the case of Bihar, not just a terminology. Besides, the Upper Backwards are not given the benefits of many schemes like "Mukhyamantri Civil Seva Protsahan Yojna" unlike lower backwards.Admantine123 (talk) 14:02, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Admantine123 (talk) 14:17, 15 June 2022 (UTC)


 * No, I am not from Engg background, on this part I would disagree. I am not here to explain my qualifications. For rest of your points, there is still ambiguity on upper backwards but I would go with your point as this is related to the group in a particular state. So, no problem I agree state to state sub-categorisation can vary. Akalanka820 (talk) 14:24, 15 June 2022 (UTC)


 * , Sir, it would be better if experts can go through all of it. I was recently pinged to correct the article on my talk page to reduce some portion in two three lines by one of the editor, I went according to it. This was alright, now the other editor is deliberately trying to have its way. Akalanka820 (talk) 03:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

There's a categorisation already existing in Bihar, in which populous backward castes like gwala, kurmi, koiri, etc. are in the category of OBC, while those who are "lower" backwards according to you are categorised as EBC, such as Mallah, Gangai, Lohar, Kumhar, etc. Hence, usage of OBC is enough here, if upper-lower thing is to be avoided. One more thing I want to ask is if there's any restriction in the addition of images in a page, since you've removed a lot of them and the reason given for removing Lalkothi palace was quite absurd. Iamritwikaryan (talk) 07:59, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

[see this] I found this news article, govt. of Bihar hasn't uploaded any document related to this but there are multiple news articles, which state the constitutional position of castes in Bihar, in which populous ones are OBC and alleged "lower" ones are EBC. Iamritwikaryan (talk) 09:47, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Usage of upper/lower word in the lead.
I wanted to know if it has been decided that upper/lower words would not be used in the lead then why are we using it along with backward castes? (see: "upper" backward castes) Since usage of just OBCs or other backward castes is enough, and the communities referred are addressed as other backward castes only in Bihar (there is a separate category for non-dominant ones, called EBC or extremely backward castes to distinguish). Iamritwikaryan (talk) 11:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * There is no such Upper and Lower in the term of Upper Backward Castes.This term has been used by many sources to describe the four communities that have reaped the benefits of Mandal Commission in Bihar. And the source used here also tells specifically about them not the OBCs.Admantine123 (talk) 11:56, 16 June 2022 (UTC)


 * "And the source used here also tells specifically about them not the OBCs."- Are you trying to say these are not OBCs? And how is there no "such" upper/lower in that term? If there is a rule it should be followed by everyone, and if there's not why my sourced content was deleted on the same ground? We can't use rules selectively, right? Iamritwikaryan (talk) 12:01, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Here is the high quality source with quotes and there are many more sources using this term specifically.Admantine123 (talk) 12:16, 16 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Stick to the subject, I'm not questioning the sources here as I had also added a sourced content which got removed, the subject is whether we can use upper/lower terms in the lead. If if you're using that despite that rule then you shouldn't revert my 'sourced' content too. Iamritwikaryan (talk) 12:18, 16 June 2022 (UTC)


 * I would say, if there is no such constitutional terms ( I am not clear on it) then upper and lower in content lead should be avoided. Akalanka820 (talk) 12:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok ✅. I changed it to make "upper strata of OBCs.Admantine123 (talk) 12:25, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

That is not a constitutional term and I've provided source too. The government of Bihar uses OBC or backward castes for Gwala, Koiri, Kurmi communities and EBC for rest of those "who did not reap benifits of Mandal commission" in that user's words. Iamritwikaryan (talk) 12:28, 16 June 2022 (UTC)


 * it again remains the same, we don't mention Rajput is upper caste in lead content. So how can we mention upper strata of OBCs ? Can't have two different logics ? Akalanka820 (talk) 12:29, 16 June 2022 (UTC)


 * OBC is constitutional word and if it OBC, it should remain Other Backward Castes. Akalanka820 (talk) 12:30, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

I've been pointing out this exact hypocrisy! That person changes other user's additions faster than bullet train but remains adamant on their own supposed "sourced" content. Iamritwikaryan (talk) 12:31, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * , changed it to OBC, not a big deal. See WP:NPA and WP:Indent. Admantine123 (talk) 12:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

I was not intended to hurt your feelings, but at the same time, it was a big deal for you to accept the double standards, which you've lately.:) Iamritwikaryan (talk) 12:40, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Crime-related things in History section.
As you had also pointed out the excessive weightage given to the rape and other heinous crimes in the history section, I think we should have a separate section for caste-based wars and tussles instead of adding them in the history section and that too much exclusively. Or, we can even move that section to the List of caste based violence in Bihar page. What do you say? Iamritwikaryan (talk) 09:38, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * He just said more WP:WEIGHT is given to that section. But with your edits, that problem is over as you have mentioned ruling dynasties and have expanded the article. Movement to caste based violence has been discussed a lot and many editors have clarified that it's not a single incident, but a pattern of abuse. Hence, can't be moved to that page, which contains sporadic events of caste violence.Admantine123 (talk) 09:58, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Dont mislead here by saying many editors. An another editor also pointed out the problem of synthesis with this subject. Akalanka820 (talk) 11:16, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Is that paragraph plausible for History section? Should we create a new section if it's that important and can't be moved to that page? Iamritwikaryan (talk) 10:26, 15 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Let me clear this out here to all this is a community page and not a Caste war page or Landlords v Depressed class page. It is clear from the edit history that one-two editors are trying to have their own synthesis here. We don't have a single JSTOR report specifically dealing with this community violence against Depressed class and a lot of these references mention "Landlords of Rajput and Bhumihars". The real destination of such a page is Zamindars of Bihar not here. Community page is not hitjob project. Akalanka820 (talk) 11:11, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

I second your view. Iamritwikaryan (talk) 11:16, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Well basic thing is that, it should be there on Wikipedia for the readers who would like to know about this. If this is gonna be the case. I am in the process to create a new article on "Atrocities against Dalits in Bihar". Since many sources are there and as i explained these are not sporadic events but a pattern, these events will be included in that article. Apart from these, i have collection of such sources, which i am going to use there. Thanks.Admantine123 (talk) 11:27, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

FYI, these events are already mentioned in List of caste based violence in Bihar page. If even then you want to create a new page you're welcome to do that, it will be better than mentioning in the pages of every other community. Iamritwikaryan (talk) 12:32, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * According to my views, this content can be removed outrightly, it will reduce much space which is taken by rape related stuffs. For Dola Pratha, i read recently in a news article that it was practised in other regions of Bihar as well. A passing mention using both sources may be sufficient.Admantine123 (talk) 12:48, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * And Mr., i am the creater of the "List of caste based violence in Bihar". But, i don't remember when did i added any rape related stuff there. PS: Except 2 cases all cases on that page are also my addition. By the way, my memory is sharp. :)Admantine123 (talk) 12:52, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * , we should not dilute anything, just remove duplications and summarize. Changing rape to sexual exploitation or even sexual violence is not correct as the latter two could also imply making street catcalling(verbal sexual violence) and exploitation could just be taking advantage. Secondly naxalism, Triveni Sangh and Kisan Sabhas and quite important. The details can be on another place. Please see the comments by Kautila03 . In the current version, there is no synthesis. This material is very relevant to this page as others have also pointed out. Let us discuss where and how to move it. If we want to remove it from the history section and keep in on some section like "inter caste disputes" on the same  page, that should be fine. After Godse killed Gandhi, innocent Brahmins - who probably had not even heard of Godse before- were harassed and some killed. I am planning to create a page on the riots but please notice that post Godse riots situation is currently on many pages although in small detail. Hence, I agree with Kautilya completely. Secondly, TB has pointed to some papers and has said that this was not only in certain villages. Can anyone go through the sources he is discussing? My earlier argument that the page is small is no longer true, so I am not even sure if we need any changes - except about Dola Pratha(maybe?). About Dola Pratha see Kalyan Mukerjee (1970: 1536-39), who writes about the peasant revolt in Bhojpur district (Bihar), says that 'izzat' (dignity) and 'unche niche jatka sangharsh' (upper and lower caste tensions) are the chief sources of conflict and tension between them. He further argues that the dehumanization of the lower castes is violent and physical: the dehumanization of the lower castes is violent and physical: rampant sexual tyranny perpetuated by the upper castes on lower caste women, the pride of the Bhumihar whose unwritten law prohibits them to remain seated in their presence even at their door steps, viewing and even wearing of a clean dhoti or receiving education, as intolerable ignorance, the "hakim" suffix after every sentence, at places the taking of dole i.e., Bhumihar or Rajput landlords are privileged to sleep with the new bride of a lower labourer on the wedding night. (Mukherjee, 1979: 1537)LukeEmily (talk) 23:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC) You can find this quote from Sharma's book. Here is more from Kelkar:  In summary (1) Let us move some details like village names etc. to some other page and then summarize in 2-3 sentences. Or summary may not be necessary as the article is big now. Please share your thoughts. BTW, others who committed atrocities on women should have it on their pages too for balance.LukeEmily (talk) 23:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * , we should not dilute anything, just remove duplications and summarize. Changing rape to sexual exploitation or even sexual violence is not correct as the latter two could also imply making street catcalling(verbal sexual violence) and exploitation could just be taking advantage. Secondly naxalism, Triveni Sangh and Kisan Sabhas and quite important. The details can be on another place. Please see the comments by Kautila03 . In the current version, there is no synthesis. This material is very relevant to this page as others have also pointed out. Let us discuss where and how to move it. If we want to remove it from the history section and keep in on some section like "inter caste disputes" on the same  page, that should be fine. After Godse killed Gandhi, innocent Brahmins - who probably had not even heard of Godse before- were harassed and some killed. I am planning to create a page on the riots but please notice that post Godse riots situation is currently on many pages although in small detail. Hence, I agree with Kautilya completely. Secondly, TB has pointed to some papers and has said that this was not only in certain villages. Can anyone go through the sources he is discussing? My earlier argument that the page is small is no longer true, so I am not even sure if we need any changes - except about Dola Pratha(maybe?). About Dola Pratha see Kalyan Mukerjee (1970: 1536-39), who writes about the peasant revolt in Bhojpur district (Bihar), says that 'izzat' (dignity) and 'unche niche jatka sangharsh' (upper and lower caste tensions) are the chief sources of conflict and tension between them. He further argues that the dehumanization of the lower castes is violent and physical: the dehumanization of the lower castes is violent and physical: rampant sexual tyranny perpetuated by the upper castes on lower caste women, the pride of the Bhumihar whose unwritten law prohibits them to remain seated in their presence even at their door steps, viewing and even wearing of a clean dhoti or receiving education, as intolerable ignorance, the "hakim" suffix after every sentence, at places the taking of dole i.e., Bhumihar or Rajput landlords are privileged to sleep with the new bride of a lower labourer on the wedding night. (Mukherjee, 1979: 1537)LukeEmily (talk) 23:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC) You can find this quote from Sharma's book. Here is more from Kelkar:  In summary (1) Let us move some details like village names etc. to some other page and then summarize in 2-3 sentences. Or summary may not be necessary as the article is big now. Please share your thoughts. BTW, others who committed atrocities on women should have it on their pages too for balance.LukeEmily (talk) 23:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Is Kelkar, a WP:HISTRS ?, The other reference that you mentioned takes name of Bhumihar twice and Rajput once. So why it should be added here ? I don't see an WP:AGF here. And here is another shared by the editor with whom your opinions matches, it was in the next thread: as per the above the Wire reference the other editor shared -

, looks like practice was more common with Bhumihars. I would request not to engage in fooling here. I can add the post of yesterday's comments on my talk page.Akalanka820 (talk)


 * , this is what your first quotes of Ms Kalyana Mukherjee says, it explains case to Bhumihar in details more here - Kalyan Mukerjee (1970: 1536-39), who writes about the peasant revolt in Bhojpur district (Bihar), says "that 'izzat' (dignity) and 'unche niche jatka sangharsh' (upper and lower caste tensions) are the chief sources of conflict and tension between them. He further argues that the dehumanization of the lower castes is violent and physical: the dehumanization of the lower castes is violent and physical: rampant sexual tyranny perpetuated by the upper castes on lower caste women, the pride of the Bhumihar whose unwritten law prohibits them to remain seated in their presence even at their door steps, viewing and even wearing of a clean dhoti or receiving education, as intolerable ignorance, the "hakim" suffix after every sentence, at places the taking of dole i.e., Bhumihar or Rajput landlords are privileged to sleep with the new bride of a lower labourer on the wedding night. (Mukherjee, 1979:", just see it explains Bhumihar landowners more with only cursory mention to Rajput or Bhumihar in last line. Akalanka820 (talk) 03:23, 16 June 2022 (UTC)


 * , u didn't answered it here. Do you even properly read your first reference ? Akalanka820 (talk) 13:27, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Kalayana Mukherjee talks about Bhumihar twice and casual mention of Rajput or bhumihar in last line. And what was the problem with the content that I had added, your points were covered into it. You talk about inadmissibility of synthesis, but you are doing exactly that. Akalanka820 (talk) 13:33, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Removal of rape crimes committed by individuals and attributed to whole community
Rapes and crimes committed by few people are in Wikipedia page of that community?? Painting a whole community as rapist itself is henious,that part shall be removed by Wikipedia or will file appropriate complaints about defiling a whole community to cyber crime department 47.31.204.182 (talk) 14:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)