Talk:Ralph de Warenne

November 2011
This Ralph de Warenne is the son of a Earl that died in approx 1135 AD? how can this information be conceived as an impropriety? My input will provide proof that Ralph de Warenne left a son. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fittstaber (talk • contribs) 22:08, 7 November 2011 (UTC)


 * This connection is apparently false, see:
 * http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/gen-medieval/2006-06/1149225317 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.169.174.86 (talk) 14:43, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Merge with William de Warenne
See discussion at Talk:William de Warenne on the merge resulting from the January 2017 AfD. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 12:41, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Articles for deletion/Ralph de Warenne concluded that this individual is not notable, and nothing significant has been added since to suggest he was more notable than was apparent when the AfD closed so that verdict has to be considered as still in force. I have thus completed the long-delayed merge and conversion to a redirect.  The AfD selected William de Warenne as destination, but thus is a disambiguation page and hence not a viable merge target.  Most of the Whitchurch material was already on De Warenne family, and that seems the best target, and still within theso I decided a redirect there is still within the spirit of the AfD. Agricolae (talk) 18:28, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * You're mistaken. agreed to change the close to no consensus, in the discussion I linked to above. He seems to have forgotten to update the AfD itself, so I'll go ahead and correct that. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 21:07, 8 April 2018 (UTC)