Talk:Ramírez Codex

Change of linked text
I've replaced the previous link given here to the "Olmos" version translation (at the "Mexico Uprising" site), with a link to the original edited version by Christensen at the FAMSI site. It seems that the Mexico Uprising site has simply copied the entire reproduction provided by the FAMSI site, complete with Christensen's annotations and comments. While the actual text of the eng. translation itself is Public Domain (pub. 1883), Christensen's annotations are not, and it seems dubious of the M.U. site to have lifted it in entirety. Also, the hyperlinked notes to the text don't work at the M.U. site.--cjllw | TALK  05:11, 31 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Good catch. Thank you, CJLL.   14:18, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Title of article
I googled "Tovar Codex" because I saw that there was another codex called the "Ramírez Codex". The WDL I cited stated the second section of the Tovar Codex is nearly identical to the Ramírez Codex but did not use the name Ramírez Codex to refer to this part of the Tovar Codex. I think it would be more clear if this article were renamed "Tovar Codex" and had a section about this connection. VeryGoodDog (talk) 15:00, 3 January 2019 (UTC)