Talk:Ram (rocket)

Minor items
Another interesting article! A month's development, that was quick. Here are a couple points: Boneyard90 (talk) 05:01, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * "the traditional bazooka's weapon"? Isn't the bazooka a weapon? Is that redundant? Perhaps, "more armor penetration than that of the traditional bazooka". Even "traditional" is kind of odd. Conventional? Established?
 * In the sentence, "to use the HVAR or napalm;[8] with the end of the war in 1953", that semi-colon should probably be a period.
 * Which planes carried the Ram? The photos show the Ram loaded on a Corsair and a Bearcat, but neither those nor any other planes are mentioned in the text.
 * I've modified the article per your suggestions. Thanks! - The Bushranger One ping only 05:35, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Major discrepancies
It's odd that the information credited to Ms Babcock's Magnificent Mavericks and the major Caltech historical documents on their Anti-Tank Aircraft Rocket (ATAR a.k.a. RAM) program state contrary "facts". Are we to disbelieve the Caltech reports of their own rocket programs? I hope some of the other editors will work with me on this, especially if you possess a copy of Mavericks.Magneticlifeform (talk) 06:12, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
 * More specifically, can anyone confirm that page 181 of Mavericks actually claims that RAM can penetrate 24 or 25" of steel armor plate?Magneticlifeform (talk) 06:57, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Can confirm. HERE--MandolinMagi (talk) 03:49, 3 November 2017 (UTC)