Talk:Rama/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.

The article is not at the moment anywhere near GA quality. The lead section has a fair amount of reliable sources in it, but this section is supposed to summarise the rest of the article, whereas it now contains unique information. Then there is the "Etymology" section with no references at all, which it certainly should have. After this there are sporadic references, but these are almost entirely references to the Ramayana, which must be considered a primary source, which makes use of it original research. Further to this, there is plenty (probably excessive) of information on the mythology of Rama, but almost none on modern scholarship on the deity, and social aspects of the cult around him. Lampman (talk) 17:23, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Since no significant improvements have been made to the article over the last week, I will now delist it. 128.232.247.165 (talk) 21:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Premchanda: The article is indeed very good and informative about Hinduism. I have created a wikipedia page on "Tamsa river" which is refered in this article for Rama. Also I have linked the river "tamsa" to wikipedia page "Tamsa river". Also i don't know how to place comments. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Premchanda (talk • contribs) 05:49, 2 September 2009 (UTC)