Talk:Ramachandra Guha/Archive 1

The Reference Section needs to be fixed
It should be noted that most of the "References" section are not properly listed as References. References included the name of the publication or source of material, along with the title, the author, the publisher and the date or year of publication, depending on the origin of the material. However, here it is a mix of Notes (without the publication information) and Reference materials, many of which are incomplete in their current format... Stevenmitchell (talk) 23:09, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Biased POV FAN BOY Promotional Article
This comes across as a promotional material for guha, a page created by the fans or paid people? So much of flowery language "acclaimed book" etc and no balanced view, and it lists all his so-called STAR ACCOMPLISHMENTS and so on. lol. Where is criticism section? @ChatuEditors 222.164.212.168 (talk) 17:34, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Goa tweet
Article on personal life does not make it clear why a tweet of a photo of someone eating meat is generating issue?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramachandra_Guha#Personal_life

1. I know this is related to hindus not eating beef. Is not made clear in article at any point however and assumes reader will know this 2. is not made clear whether Guha is himself a hindu as an explanation 3. Further even assuming both 1 and 2 are known it is not made clear why this would generate controversy. It is presumed that reader is aware that india is religiously intolerant and even if it is should it be presumed reader will know this? 4. are there any laws against eating beef in Goa? If so then controversy is generated by illegal act - though in this case it is the law that is the problem

I tried accessing the goan paper article to read but i think its got paywalled so cannot. can someone with ability to read oriiginal source help please? not sure what is background to this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.107.86.21 (talk) 06:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)