Talk:Ramariopsis kunzei/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:21, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Nice looking fungus! Just two thingies: May we mycomorphbox her? Also, anything on the specific epithet kunzei? Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:06, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Added MMB; as to the epithet, I was not able to find a source to tell me. My guess is it is Otto Kuntze, but I could not rule out it being botanist |Karl Sebastion Heinrich Kunze. All I can give is my assurance that I will insert this information if I ever find it cited somewhere. Or maybe, someone "out there" will be able to do it :) Sasata (talk) 04:50, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, the universe ain't perfect ;) We pass! Rcej (Robert) - talk 08:06, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Ramariopsis kunzei passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: