Talk:Rambles in Germany and Italy/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Your usual stellar job. I've made some very minor tweaks to reduce some redundancy, etc. In the section on the nationalist revolutions and the Carbonari, etc., I tweaked a little more than elsewhere--some of the text was misleading. Of course, I haven't read your sources for those, but I have read others, so let me know if I've stated something in a way that your sources did not, and I'll find you a citation. It should be okay. Fascinating subject, btw, and well done! I'll let you have the honors of putting the article in the proper lists. Enjoy!Auntieruth55 (talk) 23:30, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Thanks! I was trying to simplify the Italian situation too much, I think! Awadewit (talk) 03:11, 10 October 2009 (UTC)