Talk:Rancho Camulos/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:55, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I fixed two dead links. However a number of important statemnets are unreferenced, I have tagged them.  All sources appear reliable.
 * Done.  howcheng  {chat} 00:52, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Some referencing issues to be fixed, on hold for seven days, major contributors and projects will be notified. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:28, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, everything alright now. Keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:22, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Some referencing issues to be fixed, on hold for seven days, major contributors and projects will be notified. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:28, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, everything alright now. Keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:22, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, everything alright now. Keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:22, 22 November 2009 (UTC)