Talk:Rancho Tehama shootings

Expanding the lead section to be more compelling
and any other interested editors. The lead section needs a lot of work to meet our Manual of Style Lead Section Guidelines to make it more compelling. Here is a handy supplement to help nurture a satisfactory lead. Happy editing. Having fun! Cheers! 03:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 *  Reply -, WP:BEBOLD. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:20, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, . I will, but I wanted to call in the troops! Anything you can bring to the table is a good thing. Having fun! Cheers!  16:00, 20 November 2017 (UTC)


 * I'm not familiar enough with the topic to really have anything useful to add. My general rule when it comes to article leads is "a bright 14 year old with no prior knowledge of the incident, who read only the lead, would come away knowing what happened, why the incident is considered significant, and (once the dust has settled) what the consequences were". I concur with the WP:BEBOLD advice above, and would also say "make sure you come back in a month or so and reassess" as by then there will be a better picture of whether it prompted any proposed changes in the law, redesign of buildings etcetera. ‑ Iridescent 12:30, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, . Read WP:LEADCREATE, then pick some facts from each article section and salt them into the lead. No subject knowledge is needed. There is even a template at that page for creating a lead in such a fashion. Having fun! Cheers!  04:56, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

As a victim (one of the students) the school shooting happened on the 14th
So yeah 97.114.175.12 (talk) 03:46, 30 May 2022 (UTC)