Talk:Random Walk Hypothesis

I'm for the simplification of this overly academic article, and I agree with the proposal of merging it into Random walk hypothesis. --Pgreenfinch 06:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

The proposal -- since Wikipedia can't have both, it's more of a requirement -- was that the two articles be merged. Nothing was said about which direction, and I'm not endorsing either. --Calton | Talk 08:10, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

As for me, I reveal that I'm endorsing the direction that I stated and that I'm for ;-) --Pgreenfinch 08:22, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Well, unless the term is usually capitalized, the article should be at Random walk hypothesis per WP:NAME. —Swpb talk contribs 22:59, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree with the merge, since it would simplify and add all the information about the topic in one single article. --Rafa 08:28, 9 December 2006 (UTC)