Talk:Random effects estimation

good idea, merge to re-estimator and redirect this page to this. This article is redundant. Frank1101 18:41, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

What about just merging it into an article called "Random effects" - that's what everyone refers to it as.

yes it is redundant

Yes, without the background given under "random effects model" this page is basically meaningless (unless you already know what all of these terms mean, in which case you would't be looking it up in Wiki) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/ (talk)