Talk:Randy Blythe manslaughter case/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: North8000 (talk · contribs) 03:04, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

I am starting a review of this article. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 03:04, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

GA criteria final checklist
Well-written
 * Meets this criteria. Possibly it is a bit too detailed, and could benefit from a bit more summarization.    Also the quotes separated out and with the large quote marks are common in journalism, but uncommon with Wikipedia (possibly discouraged?)  But these are possible suggestions for further improvement rather than being such to affect passage as a Good Article. North8000 (talk) 01:53, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Factually accurate and verifiable


 * Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 01:49, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Broad in its coverage
 * Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 01:53, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute Illustrated, if possible, by images
 * Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 01:54, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 01:55, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Meets this criteria. Has 10 images.   None are non-free, so no article-specific use rationales are required.  North8000 (talk) 03:09, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Result
Congratulaitons. This has passed as a Wikipedia Good Article. What an immense amout of nice and thorough work! Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 01:59, 12 November 2013 (UTC) Reviewer