Talk:Randy Lennox

File nominated for deletion on commons
file:c:File:Randy Lennox and the Launch.jpg Reason:No permission indicated subpage: Message automatically deposited by a robot on 08:57, 2 January 2018 (UTC). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harideepan (talk • contribs)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:36, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Randy Lennox Jan2019.jpg

coi
because insists I will spell out why the coi tag was placed by someone many moons ago. I haven't even reached 2019 yet. from a preliminary reading of this article i can see many sections that can be straight deleted. i leave that to an editor less involved. i will keep this page on my watchlist as i suspect many more IPs and new accounts will be making similar changes in the future. Good day— RetroCosmos  talk 16:46, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * the following IPs have made zero edits outside this page, and their edits seem to be PR-related:


 * @RetroCosmos I saw your note on my talk page and read through the conflict of interest documentation. I do not believe it applies to me, but given that I've made only a handful of edits total I can see why you might think that.
 * I looked at those edits/IPs and agree with you that whoever made them was pretty clearly biased. The bias was only part of why I thought it was appropriate to delete them, they were also unsourced and had weird formatting. I'm confused, was that not the right thing to do? If this was a misstep, I welcome clarification.
 * I also agree that a lot of the article could be pared back substantially, probably by 30-50%. Particularly 'Career' & 'Documentaries & Productions.' I would be happy to take a first cut at editing those sections for clarity and conciseness, but it's not clear whether or not that would welcomed.
 * Please let me know the appropriate way to constructively respond. -BBiz2257 (talk) 17:46, 12 March 2024 (UTC)