Talk:Rank–size distribution

Confusion between largest and 'primate' cities
Geographers seem to draw a distinction between the ‘primate city distribution’ versus the ‘rank size rule’. So the largest city in a nation or region is not necessarily a primate city, as the article previously suggested. Pondle (talk) 21:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Hasn't this been discredited?
I'm pretty sure that the simple rank-size distributions described here have been discredited for city size within an urban network and for income. 173.66.211.53 (talk) 21:22, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 03:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Rank-size distribution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151117025939/http://blogs.technet.com/b/lliu/archive/2005/03/12/394732.aspx to http://blogs.technet.com/b/lliu/archive/2005/03/12/394732.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070213211558/http://people.few.eur.nl/vanmarrewijk/geography/zipf/ to http://people.few.eur.nl/vanmarrewijk/geography/zipf/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070302005906/http://www.oup.com/uk/orc/bin/9780199280988/01student/zipf/ to http://www.oup.com/uk/orc/bin/9780199280988/01student/zipf/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081217102026/http://www.mkimura.com/wikipedia/UseOfABM_RS.pdf to http://www.mkimura.com/wikipedia/UseOfABM_RS.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:08, 26 January 2018 (UTC)