Talk:Rape in Afghanistan

Untitled
This is a good start but there is still some work to be done here. The article lacks citations throughout.I would refer to the Wikipedia page for rape when trying to define it. Wikipedia writing does not allow for you to present new original ideas. You are simply presenting evidence. In that note, make sure that you don't use words that insinuate or provide an opinion. Also, I would merge the prevalence and statistics section together. As far as the laws, you will need to some more research. The current President of Afghanistan is Ashraf Ghani. You will need to update the leader as well as the outcome of the law. The article also needs some good editing throughout. I hope this helps. I will check again tomorrow. Keep up the good work.24.176.134.15 (talk) 04:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC) Ingrid.bego (talk) 04:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AlexDHansen.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Reverts
With this edit you have removed a link and restored a stub of a sentence which was meaningless. Please explain why?-1Firang (talk) 21:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC)


 * You also removed sourced content with this edit. Please explain. It is sourced content, even if it's slightly similar to content elsewhere.-1Firang (talk) 21:45, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Like I stated before you moved the source tag and placed it above and added a citation needed tag which was not needed as the reference provided that information.
 * Also why do you want to keep the same repeated statement in the statistics section as the dame things are already mentioned in the afghan law section? Shinakho (talk) 21:47, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I did not see that in the citation; you should perhaps type here what it says. The sentences in the "Afghan law" section and "Available statistics and stigma" section are slightly different and since both are sourced, you should not remove them as it is not allowed to remove sourced content.-1Firang (talk) 22:07, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * If you do cntrl f you can find it and yes my point and view is that it should be removed they talk about the samethings and the same topucs even if they are worded different there is no need to have it if they are the samething. Shinakho (talk) 22:50, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I believe you need to explain/intervene here now.-1Firang (talk) 03:18, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't intend to get involved in the content discussion. Please consider using WP:3O or WP:DRN. Abecedare (talk) 06:36, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I hope you have read what the admin has typed above. If I complain about your reverts at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard, you'll be blocked or banned. I will refrain from complaining there about you if you promise to:-
 * Avoid removing any content, even if you think it is a repetition.
 * Let me remove the incomplete sentence, "Under some interpretations of Shari'a." which you have left after your last edit.
 * Let me add a link to the term Sharia (I want to link it to the Islamic law article)
 * Let me add a link to the term stoning (I want to link it to the Stoning in Islam article)
 * Let me change "100 lashes" to "hundred lashes".
 * -1Firang (talk) 17:07, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * You are misunderstanding/misrepresenting what WP:DRN is. It is to help editors reach consensus about content through mediated discussion; it is not a board for complaining about editor conduct. And you must make a good-faith effort to resolve the dispute among yourself or through WP:3O etc before a DRN mediator agrees to volunteer their time to the issue. Abecedare (talk) 17:39, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * OK, I stand corrected. I hope you, Shinakho, agree to what I have suggested above here itself, instead of disturbing others with WP:3O.-1Firang (talk) 18:06, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Are you … are you trying to blackmail another editor? Googleguy007 (talk) 23:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * No, just trying to avoid disturbing others with WP:3O - consensus can be reached here itself. Now since you have turned up here, you can see and comment on my proposals above.-1Firang (talk) 07:41, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Telling another editor that you will have them blocked unless they agree to let you do whatever you want (a ridiculous threat, by the way) is not how you achieve consensus!
 * Looking at each of the requests above:
 * - utterly ridiculous. You cannot ban other editors from ever removing content. Why on earth would we want to include the same information multiple times?
 * - This is a good fix.
 * - This seems reasonable.
 * - Seems generally reasonable, though there may be slight WP:EASTER issues in that some of the context of where the link leads is lost.
 * - this would be a poor change. "or hundred lashes of the whip" is not correct English, it should be "or one hundred lashes of the whip". Per MOS:NUMERAL either option is fine, and I see no reason to use the more wordy version here.
 * 163.1.15.238 (talk) 16:27, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Wait for a consensus before making edits and you havent replied to the other users points. Shinakho (talk) 08:12, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I did not do anything that the IP objected to. The source says, "Zina has been reported from every province of Afghanistan", so I have typed, "Zina has been reported from every province of the country" in the "Prevalence" section. Now if I go report your reversion to an admin, both you and I may get sanctioned further. Please read the source and comment.-1Firang (talk) 11:18, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * , for your information, I have asked for a third opinion here.-1Firang (talk) 11:36, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * you removed my request for a 3rd party opinion, so I request you to look at the comments in this section and type something (your opinion). and I have already been blocked from editing this article for a week and now  is continuing the same behavior after the block expired.-1Firang (talk) 11:43, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I only removed it because it was not in the required format for the page and gave no link to the discussion, nor any indication of an actual content dispute. You are welcome to make a properly formatted request on the page, but please follow the instructions on the page. Just saying that someone has reverted your edits does not indicate any reasonable discussion to give an opinion to. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 11:55, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * , for your information, I have asked for a third opinion here again.-1Firang (talk) 13:21, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Its been a week I don't anyone will come. Shinakho (talk) 13:20, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * So what do you want?-1Firang (talk) 14:48, 18 July 2023 (UTC)