Talk:Rapides du Cheval Blanc

The wikipedia article titled Rapides du Cheval Blanc is slated to be deleted. "No proof of notability"

notability meaning: Notability is the property of being worthy of notice, having fame, or being considered to be of a high degree of interest, significance, or distinction.

I have online newspaper story links to the park, the physical size of the river and park is significant as cited in the city of Montreal's own PDF of the park. http://ville.montreal.qc.ca/pls/portal/docs/page/nature_en_ville_fr/media/documents/ecoterritoires_rapides_ChevalBlanc.pdf

city of Montreal's web page on the ecoterritory http://ville.montreal.qc.ca/portal/page?_dad=portal&_pageid=5697,32927591&_schema=PORTAL —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark v1.0 (talk • contribs) 23:58, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes this article still needs a lot of improvement.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 00:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

I have to add a visual map of the area, but a map that wikipedia will accept.

At the start of the rapids is a bridge for trains. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_bridges_to_the_Island_of_Montreal

Île Bigras railway crossing photo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Railway_bridge_in_Pierrefonds.JPG

I also have a PDF of the geology of the rock I have to link. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.243.254.224 (talk) 21:42, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

New March 19 2013
Editor with IP 208.71.8.78 is strange. 1 Doesn't comment here before their edit and (2) There are only two legends of the white horse. Now (March 19,2013) wants to fix grammar after massive cutting.--184.160.43.248 (talk) 03:31, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Map at beginning
I can not get a map of Montreal on the right hand side, with a pin of the location of the rapids, working. The problem may be the template model name?--Mark v1.0 (talk) 14:39, 8 December 2016 (UTC) FIXED. I copied another template and changed the relevant information. --Mark v1.0 (talk) 14:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

recent edits removing image/photos
An editor removed the images/photos in the article writing there were too many. This is an arbitrary judgment. I did not see the complaint/critic that there was too many images.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 16:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

history
The history of building on the land is totally gone or messed up since the last editor. The new development 2008 west of the park is gone? I don't know where to start to correct it.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 14:37, 21 May 2021 (UTC)