Talk:Rational Automation Framework

Neutrality
I would just like to point out that Wikipedia does not prohibit people with a connection to the subject matter writing articles. I have done my best to make this article neutral in tone and exclude any kind of marketing-oriented language. If anyone has concerns about the neutrality of the article, please bring them up here and I will be happy to address them. Lshiner (talk) 13:30, 5 July 2012 (UTC)


 * I think the article is basically good, but not immune to criticism. The tag merely encourages other editors to improve the page, but it also specifies the Talk page has specific actionable items to address it, which isn't actually true. A few areas that caught my attention:
 * "increasingly important"
 * The heavy use of vendor sources (4-7)
 * Instead of "providing..." can we say what it is?
 * It's not bad, but a little heavy on the features without a lot of content on its history and context
 * At a glance the external links look pretty heavy


 * It's a good article, but the tag just encourages readers to improve on it. While you're under no obligation to do so, if you wanted to improve it yourself you could provide an alternative version in a sandbox and use the request edit tool. User:King4057 17:00, 6 July 2012 (UTC)