Talk:Ravindra Jadeja/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Harrias (talk · contribs) 12:24, 29 September 2013 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

The article suffers from generally poor prose, and there is an inconsistent use of abbreviations for scores and bowling performances throughout the article. The article focusses too much on these statistics, without relevant commentary on his actual performances. The article is mostly well-referenced, but there are occasions on which far too many references are provided (are five really needed for the fact he was called "Sri Sri Pandit Sir Lord Ravindra Jadeja" by Dhoni?) On the other hand, there are some facts included without references, and those references that are provided are inconsistent and incomplete. The tables at the bottom do not meet MOS guidelines on accessibility and sortability.  Harrias  talk 12:24, 29 September 2013 (UTC)