Talk:Razamanaz

Fair use rationale for Image:Razamanaz.jpg
Image:Razamanaz.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Razamanaz.jpg
Image:Razamanaz.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Track listing
Shouldn't this follow the original vinyl LP (with a first/second or A & B side) ? Today has the Vinyl revival come so far, that vinyl records are selling better than CD's again. The fairly wide genre labeled as "classic rock" to which Nazareth well could fit in (without saying "classical" rock is the optimal genre in order to describe Nazareth's style - that is still "hard rock". But "hard rock" is usually kind of included in the wider term "classic rock". Just to avoid any confusion). Hence I feel it becomes even more important to use track listing as of LP's. It's not only about the two sides, because sometimes does the seconds differ as well. Like length of a song is stated f.i. as 4:38 on the original vinyl LP, can it sometimes be 4:36 or 4:29 on a far later produced CD. And yes, even though vinyl appears to beat CD's, do I know that MP3 and streaming plays a part in the statistics, but still. (I want to add that I think we only are in the beginning of the "second vinyl age" - I've seen combined 1950's retro wooden box gramophone with included amplifier, speakers and with direct MP3 recording possibility and USB connection and analogue connection for yet stronger amplifiers (and thereby use of any old speakers. I think a radio receiver was build in as well. And for a price of like 300 Pound. I guess the music industry has began to understand the value of "music collectors" - Before the mid 1980's did such persons have a collection of 500 vinyl LP's up to several thousands, without becoming regarded to be any sort of a geezer. With the CD did the music industry shoot itself in its feet, somehow. I the long run, anyway. Music was also something people physically cared for, and while listening to the records, was the cover and (often) inner-sleeves studied. All that simply vanished with the CD. And the same could be said about streaming and MP3. Boeing720 (talk) 18:22, 3 February 2017 (UTC)