Talk:ReCore/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Gamingforfun365 (talk · contribs) 00:34, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

I shall take a look at this article to spot any errors to be resolved.

Plot

 * "...world of Far Eden as Joule Adams (Erika Soto)..." Source?


 * "...and her corebot Mack (Jonathan Lipow)..." Source?
 * Removed.


 * "...Joule Adams (Erika Soto), one of the colonists, and her corebot Mack (Jonathan Lipow)..." could be interpreted as . I suggest changing the sentence into "".




 * "On the order of Victor (Alex Fernandez)..." Source?
 * Removed.




 * "...Kai Brehn (Harry Shum)..." Source?





Development

 * David Dedeine, Scott Green, Takuya Shiraiwa, Eric Weiss, Berenger Fish, Masahiro Yasuma, Kevin Choteau, Jack Mathews (possible misspelling of "Matthews"), Marc-Antoine Bernard-Brunel, Todd Keller, Shinsuke Komaki, and Patrice Bourroncle are only talked about in the main infobox, rather than both that and in the "Development" section.
 * Not misspelling. These names come from the closing credits.
 * Can you use Template:Cite video game in the infobox? Gamingforfun 3 6 5 ( talk ) 02:10, 13 December 2016 (UTC)









Reception

 * I find the section to be using a lot of quotations. I suggest paraphrasing some parts of it.


 * Any sales information to cover as well?
 * Microsoft doesn't release sales information.


 * There are reviews that can be added to the "Reception" section; they include IGN's review, VentureBeat's review, GamesTM's review, Hardcore Gamer's review, Game Informer's review, EGM's review, Shacknews' review, Slant Magazine's review, and Metro's review. Now, (EDIT: I know what you may be thinking: that) that is a lot of reviews in my opinion, but, at least, a few of the given sources (such as IGN and EGM) would do.
 * I have to tell you. I don't think any more review summaries are going to add anything. I'm trying to write the one from EGM and it contains exactly the same praises and criticisms currently cited in the section. The case is the same for IGN. It has already been established what critics think of the game. Cognissonance (talk) 19:35, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Very well. Gamingforfun 3 6 5 ( talk ) 20:27, 13 December 2016 (UTC)