Talk:ReRites/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Aintabli (talk · contribs) 08:50, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

This is an interesting subject, but I have some concerns: There are plenty of primary sources, videos on Vimeo, GitHub links, books lacking page numbers. It gets pretty difficult to ensure that the content is verifiable by reliable sources. I would try to weed these out and expand the lead to be a summary of the article. This is not crucial for the article to pass a GA nomination, but I recommend citing each source that includes a range of pages under a different "Bibliography" or "Sources" section so that each page could be cited with separate references with sfn or other relevant templates. There seems to be an excess usage of quotes, which causes this article to read more like a blog article instead of an encyclopedic entry. In my opinion, the article needs some major changes, which would be outside of the scope of a GA review. Aintabli (talk) 08:50, 4 August 2023 (UTC)