Talk:React (The Pussycat Dolls song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 17:41, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

I'll review this. Expect initial comments within a week. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 17:41, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Beginning with the infobox and lead.

Infobox

 * File:The Pussycat Dolls - React.png has an appropriate FUR
 * Unless I'm missing something, there's no specific indication in the lead or body that this was recorded in 2019
 * On the other hand, WP:INFOBOXREF says that citations aren't needed here when content is already sourced within article prose
 * ✅ Removed, its speculation added by an IP address → Lil- ℧niquԐ1 - ( Talk ) - 19:58, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Lead

 * Not sure how the Interscope bit is lead-worthy
 * ✅ Removed, instead focussing on the independent bit as it is their first independent release.


 * "hits" from "medley performance of their hits" is subpar tone
 * ✅ changed hits to singles so that it's less suggestive more neutral


 * I'd drop the component charts; they don't represent overall popularity within nations unlike main charts
 * ❌, this song mainly charted on component charts, if they're excluded then there won't be any charts in the lead. → Lil- ℧niquԐ1 - ( Talk ) - 19:58, 20 April 2020 (UTC)


 * For the UK, let's just be more straightforward and say it reached number 29
 * ✅, changed to make more sense → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 19:58, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

More to come later. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 02:17, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Background

 * I'm skeptical about File:Melody Thornton LF.jpg having a non-working source URL. Unless a replacement link can be found, I recommend using another image in place.
 * ✅ replaced.


 * "By February 2010" should have a comma at its end
 * ✅, added a comma


 * This doesn't say Thornton had left the group (yet); it notes she and Scherzinger were the only members still in the band at that point once Wyatt, Roberts, and Sutta were gone. We'll need an additional ref for when her departure was.
 * ✅, found and added a new reference.


 * "several attempts for other members to join" doesn't seem to be supported here. If anything, it could be used to say that other people tried to join the group, though it only discusses one potential lineup with new members.
 * ✅, clarified


 * Only 2017 is backed up, need something else for 2018 thoughts of reforming, like this
 * ✅, clarified


 * No mention of a tour, also vaguely attributing the reunion claim to an unspecified "source" with "A source tells ET" is suspicious and suggests they're trying to hide something by not giving any sense of who that "source" is. Not an attribution that I recommend taking at face value when people can use such phrasing as a disguise for something that got pulled out of nowhere.
 * ❌, journalism is competitive and outlets often hide their sources to protect those leaking stories. Also we've not said it was confirmed, just that ET was reporting it which is factually correct. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 15:33, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * At least you didn't treat it like a firm confirmation right-then-and-there of reuniting. Providing some sense of who said "source" was (i.e. "a rep for _____" or something similar if not revealing a specific name) would give it more credibility. Regardless, it doesn't mention any future touring at all, so a different citation would be needed for such detail. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 15:52, 27 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Metro is a poor citation, and it doesn't mention Bachar leaving the group in 2008
 * ✅, added specific reference relating to Bachar's 2008 exit. Second hand reporting isn't a poor citation particularly where it was a physical and printed interview but The Sun and Daily Mail are discouraged sources. Even though the publications have dubious POVs if an interview has happened I can't help that. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 15:33, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅, fixed → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 12:29, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

This will probably be done section-by-section. I'll let you get through the above, and then go into "Music and lyrics". <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 22:46, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

I almost forgot to mention that File:Melody Thornton at American Music Awards.jpg is A-OK to use <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 01:56, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Music and lyrics

 * In the quote box, avoid curly quotation marks per MOS:CURLY, and I'm guessing you meant to use this instead of the Idolator citation attached to Scherzinger's comments
 * ✅, corrected reference. Not sure about the MOS:Curly thing as I couldn't find an occurance of them.
 * I've fixed this for you here and made a couple of other corrections, nothing major. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 20:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)


 * "play overly nice man's emotions in the hopes of eliciting a more... powerful reaction" is missing "with an" after the "play" part


 * Just curious, is Female First normally deemed viable? Not that it's being used for anything contentious, but I'm not familiar with this publication.
 * Its a celebrity entertainment site, similar to Digital Spy in the UK. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 14:06, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Artwork

 * The semi-colon from "Roberts; outfit was legless" should be an apostrophe


 * You don't need to use the same citation more than once in a row when all consecutive text it's attributed to in that paragraph supports the content. See WP:REPCITE for more.
 * ✅ → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 14:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

"Release" shall follow next. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 01:56, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Release

 * "the song wasn't available"..... avoid contractions unless part of a quote or title per WP:CONTRACTIONS


 * since not everyone is familiar with how "noughties" means 2000–2009, I recommend just giving that decade's name for the sake of simplicity, even though you've linked the term
 * A little nitpick; the hyphen in "2000-2009" should be a dash (–) so it reads like "2000–2009" per MOS:DASH. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 15:25, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * A little nitpick; the hyphen in "2000-2009" should be a dash (–) so it reads like "2000–2009" per MOS:DASH. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 15:25, 1 May 2020 (UTC)


 * No mention of Interscope
 * Whilst Interscope isn't mentioned, I don't think I need to source that Interscope is no longer their label as I've sourced elsewhere in the section that they're independent artists now and their previous albums were released on Interscope (as sourced on each of their album pages). → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 11:00, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Perhaps Interscope could be removed altogether when there's more focus on being on an independent label to begin with. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 15:25, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅, removed references to interscope and left as an independent release. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 15:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


 * In "released to digital outlet", did you mean to say outlets as a plural?
 * ✅, that is what I meant. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 11:00, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

"Live performances" will probably come after you've had a chance to go through the above. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 21:03, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Live performances

 * I will assume good faith that File:Pussycat Dolls - React (GAY Live).png is in fact your own work
 * ✅, it is :) → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * "alongside previous hits"..... see my previous comment on "hits"
 * ✅, I've changed all references of 'hits' to 'singles' per what we agreed further up. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * Buzzfeed is filled with lots of user-generated content and should be avoided, even when being used to express opinions
 * Matt Stopera wrote this particular piece, he is deputy editor of the site and has his own wiki article. He also appears in several internet searches so I would assume he is notable for inclusion. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * Don't capitalize "ate" in "ATE [up] their performance", and altering quotes is misleading to readers; the cited article doesn't use "up" in that line
 * ✅ changed → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * E! shouldn't have italics when it's a network
 * ✅ changed → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * More MOS:CURLY issues with the test card quote from Andy and Dec's Saturday Night Takeaway
 * ✅ I think I've fixed this? → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -
 * For the "music and lyrics" section, yes, but not in this one and I just fixed it myself


 * "their previous hits as part of"..... same as before
 * ✅ as above, I've changed all of this → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * "Scherzinger [was] noticeably singing over the top of a separate pre-recorded track," once again alters a quote where it shouldn't by inserting "[was]"
 * I'm not sure I agree, per this article here it is standard practise in academic writing to add words for explanation. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -
 * Regardless, I've reduced the sentence a bit to avoid redundancy (which I somehow hadn't noticed before) <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 02:03, 8 May 2020 (UTC)


 * "a medley of hits"..... more of the same problem
 * ✅ changed as above → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * The Nova FM 96.9 link isn't working, and neither is its archived version, which makes it hard to verify the attributed text :/
 * ✅ changed the reference → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * No mention here of this track or any tour, only has a video of the group performing "Don't Cha"
 * ✅ apologies, the references had changed post article. I've replaced with a better one :) → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 10:43, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Another section done. More to follow later. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 23:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Critical reception

 * To avoid WP:SYNTH, you should implement a citation that specifically notes whether a song overall receives favorable/mixed/unfavorable reviews
 * ✅, removed first phrase


 * Only the name "Rob" is given for Official Charts Company, and I wouldn't be so quick to assume it's short for Robert when "Robin" is another possibility (even if less likely)
 * ✅, removed. He is called Robert Copsey (a search on twitter reveals that) but in context of the reference I appreciate he should be cited as is. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 20:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Yahoo! News (a more specific link you probably meant to use) shouldn't have italics
 * ✅, it was, thanks. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 20:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Idolator calls this "one of the first standout releases of 2020" (I added bold here for emphasis), not "standout smashes from 2020"
 * ✅, agreed, changed to reflect. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 20:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)


 * I'd elaborate a bit on the Rolling Stone review as "praised the 'bouncy pop tune'" feels incomplete, maybe on how it calls this "catchy". Also, there should be a comma after "God".
 * ✅, fixed. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 20:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)


 * See previous comments on Buzzfeed
 * Matt Stopera wrote this particular piece, he is deputy editor of the site and has his own wiki article. He also appears in several internet searches so I would assume he is notable for inclusion.  → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 20:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

To be continued..... <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 02:03, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Comment: Please note that Vents is a PR website. That description is lifted directly from The Pussycat Dolls' PR management and is not the view of a music critic and should not be included here per WP:PRSOURCE.  Cool Marc  ✉   21:51, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , good spot! Thank you for that note, I've removed the phrase/commentary from the critical reception section. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 21:57, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Media impact reception

 * Not sure I'd call this "impact"
 * ✅ - changed to media reception to differentiate between critics reception and media reception. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 15:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Sexual image

 * While I don't see any licensing issues with File:LizzoBrixt06Nov19-10 (49216792848) (cropped).jpg, its use here feels more decorative than anything else
 * left as is, other GA-nominated/reviewed articles have similar images when songs are compared to other artists or featured artist. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 15:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Calling something "sexy" (another way of saying someone finds it appealing, taken from "their sexy dance moves") is an opinion and feels repetitive anyway when "sexual nature" is already mentioned in the sentence
 * ✅ removed. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 15:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)


 * "the comedy nature" → "the comedic nature"
 * ✅ removed. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 15:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Unless I'm missing something, this doesn't give any indication that the Ant and Dec performance got any more fewer complaints than the one on The X-Factor: Celebrity
 * ✅ The Interview response was responding to group receiving more complaints (in general) about their performances not that the Ant and Dec performance received more complaints. The sentence(s) are saying that despite making the performance comedic, more people complained about the Pussycat dolls performing "React" on TV. The intention isn't to say that one performance received more complaints than another nor do I think that is how it reads. I've changed the phrasing to say that despite being comedic, the group's performance once again got complaints. Hopefully that is what you meant?
 * Actually, I meant how the given ref doesn't seem to support the claim "although the number was smaller than those received for The X Factor performance" (writing "more" was an error on my part). That should be removed. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 22:57, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅, that makes more sense. It is implied across the two sources but I appreciate its a little WP:SYNTHy the way its written so I've removed that :) → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -

Criticism of media coverage

 * "News AU" → News.com.au
 * This is a reference name so not significant to change → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 15:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)


 * What makes Junkee a viable source?
 * There is some coverage on their About page which suggests some notability here → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 15:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)


 * There seems to be a stray quotation mark at the end of "cut to another segment"
 * ✅ fixed


 * "slammed" doesn't seem like the most professional tone
 * ✅, changed "slammed" to "disapproved of" and also reductive to misogynistic. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 15:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Up next will be "Chart performance". <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 00:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Chart performance

 * An in-text citation should be provided for Israel
 * ✅ → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * Hungary is worth including when the song reached number 9 there. Same with Ireland at 23.
 * ✅ → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -
 * You only seem to have inserted Hungary. Ireland still should be added. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 02:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The repeated use of "debuted" is a bit much; try interspersing synonyms like "opened" and "entered" so the prose doesn't feel so monotonous
 * ✅ → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * Not sure "all of the group's singles released in the UK to date have charted in the top-forty" is really relevant.
 * not changed its context so rather than saying the song was or wasn't successful its context to how its performed in general. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * This doesn't say or even suggest "React" is the group's first entry on the UK Indie Chart, only how it entered at number 4 on that
 * ✅, this was implied as earlier on we've sourced that this is their first independent release therefore by default its their only entry on the chart. But I'll remove for the sake of clarity. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 10:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Get through these, then more will follow. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 22:57, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Background Development

 * "Production" or "Development" seem like more appropriate titles for this subsection
 * ✅ → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * When the Pussycat Dolls are an American group, "14 January 2020" should follow the American MDY format (January 14, 2020) as opposed to DMY.
 * ✅ → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * TooFab overall seems like a dubious publication, so I'd opt for something stronger.
 * ✅, replaced with Metro → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -

Concept and synopsis

 * I'm not convinced File:Pussycat Dolls - React Music Video.jpg meets criterion#8 of WP:Non-free content criteria.
 * I've been very careful to use a limited screenshot that is explained by the caption. The license on the image page clearly states "It is believed that the use of a limited number of low-resolution screenshots for identification and critical commentary on the music video in question. I believe this does satisfy the conditions of WP:NFCC.


 * Mirror and Metro are subpar citations that I recommend replacing
 * ✅ → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * "drench in water and against backlit flames"..... actually, the given ref says "drenched in water, backlit by flames"
 * ✅ → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * Entertainment Weekly has already been linked earlier, so unlink it here per WP:OVERLINK
 * ✅ → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * The link used for The Times Hub isn't working
 * ✅ removed, the site has been hacked. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * Use double quotation marks for "human teepee" (meaning " as opposed to the single ')
 * ✅ → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * "the most intense thing I’ve ever done" → "the most intense thing I've ever done" (more MOS:CURLY and I've evidently underestimated how much this was previously used in the article)
 * ✅ I was not of how much they copy over when you're copying a quotation! → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * Don't italicize CNN when that's a network
 * ✅ → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -

Reception Release and reception

 * Maybe you could rename this as "Release and reception" given the bits on YouTube views, and at least somewhere in the main video's section there should be a mention of its release date, even if not in this subsection
 * ✅ → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -
 * Still no prose mention of how this came out the same day as the single (outside of the lead) :/ <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 21:12, 17 May 2020 (UTC)


 * More WP:OVERLINK with Entertainment Weekly
 * ✅ → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * Us Weekly (aka Us Magazine) is a horrid gossip rag that shouldn't be trusted or used as a reference
 * ✅ swapped for People and Vulture → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * "Scherzinger taking centre stage"..... this should be takes, so maybe also change "despite" to "even though"
 * ✅ → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * See previous comments on CNN, and you don't need to link it again per WP:OVERLINK
 * ✅ → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * "a 'worthwhile wait'" → "worth the wait"
 * ✅ → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * I'm sure you can find something better than PopSugar
 * ✅ → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -


 * Again, Metro isn't ideal
 * For the YouTube views, you seem to have misplaced the citations; New York Post should be attached to 340K within 90 minutes while GMA News belongs with the 1.5M in a day.
 * ✅ removed → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -

I'll get to the alternate videos next. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 02:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Cash Cash remix video

 * This seems rather short with only two sentences. Can you expand it with reviews or anything else?
 * Unfortunately there is no further coverage specifically on the remix music video. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 16:18, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * In that case, perhaps this and "acoustic video" should have their subheadings removed so we just have one "alternate videos" section that doesn't look incomplete. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 22:21, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅, I've merged and this seems to work well → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -

Acoustic video

 * CelebMix is a poor source. I have no doubt you can find something stronger.
 * Again coverage is sparse unless you want a publication like PopSugar. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 16:18, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Track listing and versions

 * With only three entries, I'm not convinced these need to be split into columns
 * ✅ → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 10:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Unless there's something I missed, this doesn't include any duration for the original version
 * If it's super necessary I can add a retail source? → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 10:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * It is needed for verifiability, and that type of link would suffice <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 14:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ added. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 16:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Making the text smaller than it naturally would be makes it harder on the eyes to read and is frowned upon per MOS:FONTSIZE
 * ✅ → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 10:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Personnel and credits

 * No issues at all

Getting closer! Hopefully I can get the rest in one go in my next batch of comments. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 21:12, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Charts

 * I can't find this song listed in the Latvia link or its archive
 * Same problem with Romania :/
 * ✅ I didn't list either to be fair. But under investigation it looks like they were added by fans and incorrectly dated etc. so I've removed both. → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) -

Release history

 * Pre-orders don't belong here
 * Since nothing specifies downloading or streaming here, it's best to use a retailer link in place of that
 * ✅ Fixed, → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 22:52, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Overall

 * Prose: A bit of merging should be done for the alternate videos
 * Referencing: Citation formatting needs work. Also, I still can't verify the content for The Times Hub, and the lead has an unsourced mention of acclaim that should be deleted. Music video release date still needs sourcing within article body. A couple of insufficiently supported chart peaks should be either removed or re-cited.
 * Coverage: Mostly good. We need Ireland to be included in "Chart performance" and an in-prose mention outside of lead talking about the main video's release (these somehow still haven't happened). Also, for the video screenshot, I recommend including some commentary (preferably from critics) specifically focusing the scene shown as that would help justify its inclusion per NFCC requirements.
 * Neutrality: No bias found
 * Stability: Nothing of concern
 * Media: All images have appropriate licensing
 * Verdict: On hold for now. Effective immediately, if all of the remaining concerns are addressed within the next seven days, then I will pass the nomination. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 22:21, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅, that should be all comments now addressed  → Lil- <b style="color:#1CA9C9">℧niquԐ</b><b style="color:#126180">1</b> <small style="color:#1CA9C9">- ( Talk ) - 14:02, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I just went through the article again, and after making some minor adjustments, I can safely promote it to GA. Congrats on the successful nomination! <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 16:30, 20 May 2020 (UTC)