Talk:Reactions to Innocence of Muslims

What is the purpose of this article?
This article by its content and timing appears to be nothing more than "anti-propaganda" propaganda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danleywolfe (talk • contribs) 18:58, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * This entire article should be summarily deleted...it is meaningless and just propaganda. A bunch of Muslims get angry over a youtube video (reportedly) lol....should that justify an encyclopedia article?  How completely ridiculous.  Lets have an article citing every place on earth people get mad over racism, or homophobia, or atheism, or name your religion.  Every day there is a protest somewhere, people get mad over stuff...whoopdee doo, to think that justifies a sourced article is blithering stupidity.  Lets make an article citing all "Black Lives matter" protests in the United States...every single one of them.  Really?  Welcome to planet earth...welcome to humanity...full of angry people, on a daily basis.  Remove this article from Wikipedia, it has no rational purpose. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.157.14.9 (talk) 07:45, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Concur. Danleywolfe and 73.157.14.9 have it right. This is the worst of Wikipedia. 2.50.17.144 (talk) 10:34, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 one external links on Reactions to Innocence of Muslims. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121124084221/http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/anti-islam-film-clinton-urges-muslims-show-tolerance/1/222103.html to http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/anti-islam-film-clinton-urges-muslims-show-tolerance/1/222103.html
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120926021934/http://businessmirror.com.ph:80/home/faith/33110-religious-groups-in-brazil-condemn-attacks-on-islam to http://businessmirror.com.ph/home/faith/33110-religious-groups-in-brazil-condemn-attacks-on-islam
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121113133746/http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501712_162-57516523/anti-american-protests-continue-in-indonesia/ to http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501712_162-57516523/anti-american-protests-continue-in-indonesia/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 11:46, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Misleading beginning of entry.
. ==

The edit of Oct 8th 2106 seems to be a "hack" of the article. The grammar is wrong but so is the content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.133.252.209 (talk) 12:31, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Reactions to Innocence of Muslims. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120918025228/http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/tunisia-death-toll-rises-to-four-in-us-embassy-attack/ to http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/tunisia-death-toll-rises-to-four-in-us-embassy-attack/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120917073417/http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/8533359/muslim-protesters-clash-with-police-in-sydney to http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/8533359/muslim-protesters-clash-with-police-in-sydney
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120916183444/http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/fury-over-mohammad-video-simmers-on-in-muslim-world/ to http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/fury-over-mohammad-video-simmers-on-in-muslim-world/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140116130132/http://www.intelligence.senate.gov/benghazi2014/benghazi.pdf to http://www.intelligence.senate.gov/benghazi2014/benghazi.pdf
 * Added archive http://web.archive.bibalex.org/web/20120915002959/http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/hundreds-of-angry-afghans-protest-anti-islam-film-in-eastern-afghanistan/2012/09/14/5865d1b4-fe5c-11e1-98c6-ec0a0a93f8eb_story.html to http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/hundreds-of-angry-afghans-protest-anti-islam-film-in-eastern-afghanistan/2012/09/14/5865d1b4-fe5c-11e1-98c6-ec0a0a93f8eb_story.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120916215310/http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2012/09/us_consulate_closes_early_beca.php to http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2012/09/us_consulate_closes_early_beca.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Off-topic and unclear connection to topic
I came across this article by accident, nowhere in the lead is any connection to Innocence of Muslims established and half the content seems to have no connection ... or if there is a connection, it isn't made clear. Pincrete (talk) 20:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Read the lede? This article is chronicling protests against the film.  The 'connection' is that the protesters didn't like it.  What exactly is unclear about that?  (Serious question, not a trolly one.)  SnowFire (talk) 20:27, 23 January 2018 (UTC)