Talk:Reactions to the assassination of Jamal Khashoggi

Creation of this article
This was created per this discussion at Talk:Assassination of Jamal Khashoggi. I just copied the talk page headers as well and tried to update them. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 07:20, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much. I have a question. Why are the countries in the second level section without a first level section in the lead? Wouldn't that make the lead too long?--SharabSalam (talk) 08:06, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Cause it looks nicer that way? Because I am stupid and forgot to fix that. It is fixed now. Because I cut and pasted the entire reactions section without its title, the countries were one level too low. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 08:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. My phone lags while editing the whole article in once. I took me a while to remove the additional "=" and I clicked published and my edit wasn't saved because you made the same edit and published it before me.--SharabSalam (talk) 08:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Your welcome and thank you for pointing it out. I love a good WP:FISHSLAP. I admire that you were willing to try to fix it on your phone. I found it a complete pain last time I tried doing that. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 08:41, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Wagging the sword
Is it peaceful the ceremony of Trump holding low and awkward the Sword in the presence of many majestic? It was certainly not a disturbance to Lehman Brothers that day. But do not underestimate there (non-possessive) want of your fullness when they invite you to perform with them in view of others. You can't afford to slack the rope laid limp in their hands and fear the loop in yours. If they catch spying a jewel mid-ceremony knows the rudeness plainly laid--by the hints and undermining, the usefulness to both sides, whether the source is aware of it or not, it is and should be at least in our pursuits absolutely unacceptable in global governance to be both unaware of dishonoring both sides and called not an offensive intention to be tolerated. Then it is not politics only perhaps, fit for the wed, nor only is it theater. So it represents the vested state of cooperations viewed by so many and potentially all someday. Sincerity is then worth a forward-looking people but is not all to the House of Saudi, I would speculate boldly after the fact about their agreements with foreign governments and consider it a sign of respect when writing the same in the U.S. 50.220.179.25 (talk) 15:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC)