Talk:Read–write conflict

I propose that the previous edit, "Removed redundant link", should be reverted, because the link to write-read conflict was not redundant. Rather, it is useful to point out that read-write conflict is different from write-read conflict. 24.18.112.168 00:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I have just done this. I have made the "See also" section consistent accross the 3 pages for Read-Write, Write-Read and Write-Write conflicts. Egriffin 12:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)