Talk:Read-Only Memory (publisher)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cognissonance (talk · contribs) 19:44, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Drunk right meow. Will start when I'm sober fam. ~(^з^)- Cognissonance (talk) 19:44, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

History and publications

 * "The 30-year anniversary" – Clarify: "The 30th anniversary".
 * Ref. 6 covers the launch of the Sensible Software Kickstarter campaign only. Ref. 3 contains the publishing date. I suggest putting Ref. 6 together with Ref. 3.
 * Contributors not included in the last sentence of the second paragraph are Mike Montgomery, Gary Bracey and Peter Molyneux.
 * "Still, the book did not appear to be one-sided" – Improve prose: "Despite this, the book was not considered to be one-sided".

Sega Mega Drive/Genesis: Collected Works

 * "Read-Only Memory released its next art book, Sega Mega Drive/Genesis: Collected Works, covering the development, life, and legacy of Sega's 16-bit console, in late 2014" – Improve flow: "Read-Only Memory released its next art book, Sega Mega Drive/Genesis: Collected Works, in late 2014—covering the development, life, and legacy of Sega's 16-bit console."
 * "over 30 interviews" – Ref. 14 says there were "almost 30 interviews".
 * Omitted interview subjects include Peter Morawiec, Rich Karpp and Michael Latham.

Overall

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: On hold.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Cognissonance (talk) 10:01, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review, ! I've addressed your points, if you'll take a look. I didn't add the additional names because the article isn't meant to be a full accounting of interviewees, but summarize the highlights (particularly the notable interviewees, who have their own articles). czar  07:06, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review, ! I've addressed your points, if you'll take a look. I didn't add the additional names because the article isn't meant to be a full accounting of interviewees, but summarize the highlights (particularly the notable interviewees, who have their own articles). czar  07:06, 5 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Good point. Cognissonance (talk) 08:30, 5 May 2017 (UTC)