Talk:Readeption of Henry VI

Do we really need this article? Could we not just incorporate it in Henry VI? PatGallacher (talk) 18:42, 21 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Unless someone objects, I will plan on nominating this article for deletion in a week or two. It certainly seems to me that the material could all be easily incorporated into the articles on Henry VI and the Wars of the Roses.  The article is over four years old now and hasn't progressed beyond an unsourced start-class state, which I think is testimony in itself that it is rather redundant. Kevin Nelson (talk) 01:16, 7 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I restored this. I don't see any reason to delete.  Perhaps it should be merged/redirected, but it is clearly a notable topic.  I've never heard that we delete articles (without an AFD!) for not being very good.  If you must try to delete again, nominate it properly. john k (talk) 14:15, 24 December 2010 (UTC)