Talk:Ready To Wait campaign

POV
The article seems to be heavily biassed in favour of those who support the campaign, which itself seems to be just another one-day wonder on Twitter. Be careful here because Wikipedia is not a soapbox. - Sitush (talk) 13:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * , why we can't just merge this to Entry of women to Sabarimala Ayyappa Temple ? Seems to be a CFORK. &#x222F; WBG converse 07:26, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Seems like it might be a good idea. You'd need to set up a formal discussion. Ping me if you do - I missed the ping below because I wasn't very active at the time. - Sitush (talk) 07:37, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * - repinging. - Sitush (talk) 07:38, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

We mention #RightToPray with no context whatsoever, which makes the articles look lop-sided and smacks of some sort of Hindutva row.- Sitush (talk) 13:25, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

@Sitush: Please feel free to add the context for #RightToPray. With regards to #ReadyToWait being a "one-day" wonder, the campaigners were made party in the Supreme Court petition on the issue which is unprecedented for social media activism. - Regards, Gayatri 23:20, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Removing the NPOV tag for the following reasons:
 * The discussion has become dormant. Original comment was published over a year ago. No response to the clarification for nearly two months.
 * A lot has happened for the campaign since 2017.
 * Have partially addressed the concerns by changing the language and adding more references and citations. Gayatri — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gayatri9876 (talk • contribs) 05:53, 1 October 2018 (UTC)