Talk:Real covenant

Minor Edits
I just made a minor edit for grammar reasons. There were weird capitalizations everywhere (and may still be).

What's Lacking
We probably need more explanation regarding privity, what it is, why and how it was applied historically, and how it is applied today. This is especially useful because some jurisdictions, like Vermont, still require horizontal privity (contrary to what this article claims). Byutennismenace (talk) 22:55, 1 May 2008 (UTC)byuTM

Merger
I believe this article should be merged w/ Covenant running with the land. Thoughts? I will add a merge tag if I recieve no feedback. Piratejosh85 (talk) 02:11, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

3 Elements or 5?
It says "Three elements must be proven for a Real Covenant Burden to run with the land:", but then it lists 5 elements. I happen to believe that it is most likely 3 that need to be proven, but I know you can't just mix and match from those 5. However, I am no expert, perhaps someone could help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.183.41.146 (talk) 01:10, 11 October 2012 (UTC)