Talk:Realitatea TV

They changed the logo and their brand!! u should keep up!Djsnoop 12:23, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

I cut out the link for the "owner" because that website is not the one of Realitatea Media, which doesn't have one!

Neutrality
The article seems more like something out of the PR section of Realitatea TV than a Wikipedia article (tone, type of information - I mean, who cares on which channels in Serbia you can watch it and what personalities were interviewed on it? -, lack of controversial themes...). I mean, it didn't even mention that the channel is owned by media oligarch Sorin Ovidiu Vântu! I added this information. I also added a POV-check tag.Lumendelumine (talk) 15:50, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Criticism
The news outlet did not recieve this kind of critics, at least not any that people know of - could you please provide a link to that?

To all of you current and future editors out there. (1) bother to learn the language before starting to write - just because it's no good to be embarrassed twice in a row; (2) remember that this is a public encyclopedia, not the local rag in which to spew your political trash; so try to do the impossible and focus on the actual facts, and present them without the usual 'flourishes' that Romanians are so fond of; hatred only breeds more hatred; this is a place for learning not mud-slinging. (Vulcandax (talk) 16:30, 7 December 2009 (UTC))
 * Thanks for the enlightenment bud, you should apply that for yourself. Didn't knew that when it comes to politics all the nations of this world, except Romanians, are so modest, sincere, honest and totally objective when talking about themselves... -- ANDROBETA 15:57, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Painfull article...
I actually came here to look for factual information on the subject, but the article is near useless. It makes bold claims, but does not cite sources whatsoever. The "citation needed" tag has not helped for several years, so there is not much help that it anytime soon.

Therefore, I'll start deleting unsourced information (which will render this article stub-like). By all means, re-add the information if you have any sources for it. Otherwise, I think it's better to have no info, than unverifiable info. Averell (talk) 09:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)