Talk:Rebecca Ferdinando

Proposed deletion of Rebecca Walsh


The article Rebecca Walsh has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Propose this be deleted on basis of WP:ENT, non-notable.

No consensus for deletion, removed offending words and added more references, way above the average on this site. gjeida — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gjeida (talk • contribs) 21:57, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Notability, weasel and peacock words, verifiability
This person has only had minor roles, yet this page uses weasel and peacock words such as "appeared in roles for leading television series" "her looks and personality", "one of London's top modelling and commercial agents" etc. to imply notability.

All main sources come from the actresses own website or her starnow profile page. These are not acceptable sources, and it reads like a news release.

Googling this actress reveals headlines about her turning up at an event and being labelled as "little known actress" such as here. The comments from the public here show that they do not know who she is. Two cases in which she has attended premieres of films she's not even in, and the only thing she is known for is her poor attire. More so than her acting. That link even says they didn't know who she was too. The only reliable news sources for this actress do not mention her acting ability or past work.

This page needs a major rewrite or a total removal as a non-notable person. 46.208.25.54 (talk) 14:45, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Added references and taken out the disputed words, some references still to find but someone in 18 films, even if 46.208.25.54 believes are minor does not constitute a deletion. Also to quote the talk section of the daily mail is mind boggling, the average daily mail reader is not a great reference! Next time 46.208.25.54, log into wiki so we know who you are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gjeida (talk • contribs) 21:56, 19 April 2014 (UTC)