Talk:Rebiana

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
This article talk page was automatically added with WikiProject Food and drink banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here. Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories, but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns, please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 18:35, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

DELETION request. (For anything “Rebiana”.)
The Coca-Cola company blatantly tries to insert their brand into ALL the articles they can on Wikipedia, acting as if it was the brand for this. There are countless such brands on the market. There is no reason to plug this one, other than Coca-Cola pouring money into vanalizing Wikipedia with it. Wikipedia is not an advertising site. Since I am not a user, I ask for admins to please rid Wikipedia of all mentions of this, and delete this advertisement disguised as an article. — 87.79.233.168 (talk) 11:34, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I doubt Coca-Cola created this article, but I don't think Rebiana sweetener is notable enough to have its own article. I've turned the page into a disambiguation page  instead.  Peacock (talk) 12:30, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh well, looks like someone simply reverted me without contributing to the discussion here. Peacock (talk) 12:20, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If you want to delete the article, the proper way is to follow the procedure described at Articles for deletion. Requesting deletion on the talk page won't accomplish anything.
 * If other brands meet inclusion criteria, we can have stand-alone articles on them also. If they don't, then we can't. It's that simple. It so happens that the topic of Rebiana meets WP:SIGCOV requirements: significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Some of those sources are cited in this article.
 * Therefore, the topic is clearly independently notable, which should have been obvious from looking at the cited sources. I am highly skeptical that a deletion nomination would succeed. You're welcome to try, but you'd be wasting your time, and the community's time, in my opinion.
 * That said, I agree that the article is short enough that it could be merged into stevia or steviol glycoside. In fact stevia already has some sentences about Rebiana. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:52, 20 February 2018 (UTC)