Talk:Rebound (dating)

Princeton paper
The princeton paper doesn't say what this page claims it says. "This paper has a single straightforward finding: there is no rebound effect" also it's not peer reviewed, not sure if that's important 75.119.228.7 (talk) 04:38, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

I modified the summary to reflect what the paper actually says: no evidence found of a rebound effect. There's no information about the paper's author in the link, but the author appears to be: Nicholas H. Wolfinger, University of Utah based on: http://paa2006.princeton.edu/sessionViewer.aspx?sessionId=259 http://paa2006.princeton.edu/abstractViewer.aspx?submissionId=61125 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.185.161.58 (talk) 07:53, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Wrong Headline
Below the headline Psychology the article describes two referneces. However, none use studies from psychological science. One is from an Tania Gabrielle is describes as an astrologer, numerologist, and psychic and the other article is from Communication Studies. There is no psychological work referenced. 89.144.221.75 (talk) 20:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC)