Talk:Reckitt

"Powerbrands"?
The term "Powerbrands" is a corporate term and it should be clearly marked as such in the article. It must not appear to be an assessment made by Wikipedia about the company's various brands. We should use another, neutral term for the best-selling, most known Reckitt brands, noting that the corporate term for them is "Powerbrands", of course properly attributed. -The Gnome (talk) 19:23, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Controversies: Continued sales in Russia
Under "Controversies", should probably include recent revelations that despite CEO Laxman Narasimhan promising to exit the Russian market in April 2022 due to their war of aggression against Ukraine (Narasimhan later resigned in Sep 2022), the company has since decided to renege on its former CEO's commitment to leave Russia. In continuing to drag their feet and delay their exit, they risk their Russian assets being seized and nationalized as Putin did to Danone and Carlsberg this past week. BulldogPunch (talk) 17:37, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Former brands
The article needs several updates to account for brands which have been disposed of, including Scholl and E45. There might be others I've missed.

Sources for those two brands:

DDFoster96 (talk) 17:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 * https://www.karohealthcare.com/karo-pharma-completes-the-acquisition-of-the-e45-brand-from-reckitt/
 * https://www.reuters.com/markets/deals/reckitt-sell-e45-skincare-brand-karo-pharma-268-mln-2021-12-24/

"Bang and the dirt is gone" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bang_and_the_dirt_is_gone&redirect=no Bang and the dirt is gone] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 21:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)