Talk:Rector v. Major League Baseball Advanced Media/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Courcelles (talk · contribs) 01:28, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

An interesting little read, I'll have some comments shortly. Courcelles (talk) 01:28, 21 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Publication date for ref 7 is wrong.
 * Still wrong. Courcelles (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Ref 4; don't abbreviate newspapers' names
 * Better now. Courcelles (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2018 (UTC)


 * "it was covered by a number of media organizations worldwide." One article in Australia?  Got any more citations for worldwide coverage?
 * Better now Courcelles (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2018 (UTC)


 * What makes ref 12, a Wordpress blog, reliable?
 * Looks to be gone. Courcelles (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2018 (UTC)


 * "Worst Lawsuit Ever" is only in caps because it was part of the title of the article, we don't need to follow that here.
 * Fixed. Courcelles (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2018 (UTC)


 * "After the decision, legal practitioners" One person's opinion, unless you've got other sources.
 * Still an issue, attribute the position, don't handwave towards multiple "legal practitioners" Or even better yet, lose this sentence which seems to be a fringe position of one man on a blog as the article stands. Courcelles (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Both refs 15 and 16 have authors and publication dates available. Ref 10 has an author available.
 * Still an issue, see now also ref 8. Courcelles (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Ref 2? Reliable or not?
 * Still don't think this is an RS. Courcelles (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Ref 14 is explicitly about postseason tickets. This was not a postseason game.
 * Better now. Courcelles (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2018 (UTC)


 * I'[m really worried about the referencing here, which seems overly reliant on blogs for the analysis. Courcelles (talk) 01:50, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I have done my best to answer your points and I think it is ready for another look now.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 18:45, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * My responses in-line. Courcelles (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I have made more alterations.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 06:28, 26 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Last thing left appears to be the legal practitioners claim about deserving disbarment, which is sourced to one guy's blog. Courcelles (talk) 13:39, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I have removed that now.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 13:54, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Good, then this one passes. Promoting. Courcelles (talk) 13:57, 26 April 2018 (UTC)