Talk:Recurrent laryngeal nerve/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Seppi333 (talk · contribs) 02:22, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Criteria
 Good Article Status - Review Criteria   		A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ; and
 * (c).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Discussion
Overall, the article looks good. Just needs 1 minor tweak (source addition) and then it satisfies GA criteria.  Seppi  333  (Insert 2¢ &#124; Maintained) 03:49, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking this review,, sorry I have taken so long to respond. We inherited the sentence, and as I can't find any sources to support it (I think the contributor may have intended to refer to vagus nerve damage), I have removed the offending sentence. LT910001 (talk) 14:40, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Review
 <li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>.</li>

<li>.</li> <li>:</li>

</ol>