Talk:RedEye

Fair use rationale for Image:EN-Chicago-Logo-Newspaper-R.jpg
Image:EN-Chicago-Logo-Newspaper-R.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:04, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Renaming
This article could be renamed The (Chicago, Ill.) RedEye to match how the newspaper is cited.Bigturtle 15:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Article is woefully out of date
Since I have a conflict of interest with the RedEye, I'll refrain from editing directly, but I will point out a few things here so someone else can come along and edit it: Thanks to whoever comes along.  elektrik SHOOS  17:21, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The circulation is now 250,000. This increased last December. (sources:, )
 * It would be nice as well if someone mentioned RedEye's Internet strides such as their Google Wave experiment (source from Mashable and it ended in April ), or the RedEye Royalty (a reader loyalty program of sorts ). This would need a bit more work, of course.
 * I've gone ahead and updated the number myself. If I have sources and I'm only updating a number, there shouldn't be an issue, but if anyone doesn't like it feel free to undo the edit.  elektrik SHOOS  17:29, 12 August 2010 (UTC)