Talk:RedTube

Regulations
The article states: "The government does not place Regulations on these porn sites, making them easily accessible for minors."

Which government? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kickme286 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Good point needs source or removal, IMHO.--Graythos1 (talk) 17:13, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Launch Date
07-02-1994

Stub
This is a stub and will always be. Is there any reason not have it marked for deletion? ~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.230.47 (talk) 08:51, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Requested move 10 December 2013

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was move per request.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 17:47, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Redtube → RedTube – The way the name is written. Huang (talk) 08:30, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.


 * Support Red Slash 03:19, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Support, seems logical and reasonable. Cheers, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 23:50, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

legal
cease and desist scandal in germany is still running, porn trolling lawyer urmann is trying to avoid jail time. major case maybe not in the u.s. but in europe where english is also spoken. not erase yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:45:4930:EB5D:C18A:E2C2:4CE7:DC01 (talk) 19:55, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Hatnote
I added hatnote based on sources I found which discuss confusion between YouTube Red and RedTube: --Mika1h (talk) 00:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * http://uk.businessinsider.com/youtube-red-sounds-like-redtube-2015-10?r=US&IR=T
 * http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2015/10/21/youtube_red_a_new_subscription_service_sounds_a_lot_like_the_porn_site_redtube.html
 * http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/2015/10/21/youtube-red-tube_n_8352196.html (auto-playing video)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on RedTube. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2009\07\26\story_26-7-2009_pg9_3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 15:35, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Dubious Criminal Prosecution in Germany
Lawyer Thomas Urmann has a criminal record now and is close to bankruptcy. He is not a lawyer anymore either. Officially it is not clear where all the money from that fraud and extortion went, unless you could read between the lines that certain judges, state prosecutors and a certain bank in Bavaria helped to transfer the extortion money to Switzerland. Otherwise, for reasons unknown to the public, the German press does not inform the public about the results of the official pressing of criminal charges against Philipp Raphael Wiik from Muenster, former director at The Archive who was actively the director when the case happened and who lives in Switzerland still; Berlin lawyer Daniel Sebastian, Hamburg native porn model Jutta Schilling aka "Julia Reaves", "IT expert" Andreas Roschu from Ingolstadt behind the mysterious software, and a few more. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/RedTube-Abmahnaff%C3%A4re (in German) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:46:1A12:9576:C134:DCED:F2BD:F552 (talk) 11:32, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Launch date wrong
The launchdate in the infobox says that the website launched in April 2007, but the link used cleaely says August 11, 2006, with a creation date in January 2006 Dpm12 (talk) 13:43, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2020
I propose the screenshot of the front of RedTube be removed from this article. It is offensive and potentially dangerous. This imagery can be deeply disturbing and possibly triggering, not to mention the potential for children to be exposed to the imagery. Readers come to Wikipedia for information, not expecting hardcore pornographic imagery. It is not necessary to show the images in order to educate the public about what RedTube is.2605:A000:1112:E464:605F:D626:2704:9A32 (talk) 11:45, 6 June 2020 (UTC) 2605:A000:1112:E464:605F:D626:2704:9A32 (talk) 11:45, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree with this edit request because the "collapsible" parameter doesn't work on mobile, so we're showing porn screenshots to all mobile users. – Thjarkur (talk) 11:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)


 * , requested over and over, see WP:NOTCENSORED for the recurring answer. —Dirk Beetstra T  C 12:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * - Please read NOTCENSORED - We're an Encyclopedia which caters for everyone not just children, We're not a dumping ground for your kids period. (I did decline this earlier before harddrive went stupid so no idea why it didn't save.) – Davey 2010 Talk 12:13, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Screenshot
Could it be considered to remove the Screenshot? I think it would be helpful to people who do not want to see porn but rather just see the information. I think that the logo is just enough considering people probably already get the premise of the website. Considering the Pornhub Wikipedia page removed their screenshot, I see no reason why the RedTube Wikipedia page can't remove theirs. Zdubzxx (talk) 17:46, 31 January 2021 (UTC)