Talk:Red Hill, Australian Capital Territory

Fork Article?
I feel this article would benifit from splitting Red Hill (the hill) from the suburb article. Photos of rocks located on the hill is way too much detail in an article nominally about a suburb. --Martyman- (talk) 05:32, 20 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Currently the article to my mind is both about the suburb and the hill/ridge as per the introductory paragraph which mentions both. The article is not yet of excessive length.  It is still very much in development and certainly needs improvement.  As it improves I hope the balance will also improve and it will become more coherent.  This is not to say that a fork is not possible, it is just that I cannot see the necessity at present.--A  Y  Arktos 10:07, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Suburb directions in infobox
I have noticed that some suburbs in Canberra, eg. Red Hill seem to have problems with east and west mixed up in suburb boxes. Is there some historical reason for this? I will do some fixing up now. Feel free to disagree and make changes. RobBrisbane 09:41, 27 June 2007 (UTC)


 * There used to be a a Canberra box, which had everthing in the right place, but it was converted to an Australian wide box, - many errors crept in at that point. GB 21:32, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Height
Davidson trig 749m --RobBrisbane 08:25, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 04:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Boxford destroyed
The garden at Boxford was destroyed some time after its sale in 2006 https://www.allhomes.com.au/21-scarborough-street-red-hill-act-2603 despite its heritage listing. At present I am yet to find an online citation for the destruction although the allhomes site makes it clear :( --Matilda talk 23:54, 18 June 2020 (UTC)