Talk:Red Museum/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 23:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Will review soon.  Ruby  2010/  2013  23:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * Add wikilinks for characters in plot
 * Not a fan of the image box; the images don't look good side by side, and the formatting doesn't quite fit the box template
 * Identify that Carter is series creator in production section
 * You repeat CBS is the network for Fences twice in the production section; you can just mention CBS the second time (and get rid of the second wikilink)
 * Executive Producer -> Executive producer
 * Identify Wong as a producer (or whatever his title is)
 * mixed-to-negative -> mixed to negative
 * Creative if convoluted -> creative if convoluted
 * "Red Museum' tries..." Is the ' a typo on your part, or the authors?
 * ❌  Ruby  2010/  2013  00:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


 * This link doesn't go where you'd like it to (find a different url?)
 * Italicize and add wikilink to Entertainment Weekly, and add date (ref 4)
 * ❌  Ruby  2010/  2013  00:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Use consistent date formatting (9 December 2011 vs December 9, 2011 for example)
 * Unitalicize Critical Myth (it's a website, not a print source)

On hold for seven days while above comments get addressed. Please respond here when you have finished. Thanks,  Ruby  2010/  2013  01:49, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, I believe I've fixed everything. Tell me how it looks!--Gen. Quon (talk) 15:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hate to be a stickler, but the above two still need fixing.  Ruby  2010/  2013  00:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Whoops! Sorry I missed those. OK, they're all fixed now.--Gen. Quon (talk) 04:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries! As all comments have been addressed, I am passing this one for GA. Nice work,  Ruby  2010/  2013  05:26, 10 January 2012 (UTC)