Talk:Red rail/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Doctree (talk · contribs) 16:11, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria Definitely will be a Good Article. Reviewer(s) are fixing a couple of minor problems rather than sending it back for a rewrite.
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * Fixed dangling preposition in third sentence of lead.
 * Grammar and spelling are correct. The writing is good.  Could use the help of an editor, perhaps from the Guild of Copy Editors, to elevate the prose to engaging, even brilliant, and of a professional standard.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * Complies with the Manual of Style.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Some images did not contain alternative text per MOS Accessibility Guidelines. Will insert them.
 * All images now contain alt= and appropriate text. DocTree (talk) 22:04, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Some images did not contain alternative text per MOS Accessibility Guidelines. Will insert them.
 * All images now contain alt= and appropriate text. DocTree (talk) 22:04, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Some images did not contain alternative text per MOS Accessibility Guidelines. Will insert them.
 * All images now contain alt= and appropriate text. DocTree (talk) 22:04, 31 July 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Additional Discussion
Requested an additional look from a Project BIRDS assessor. Hoping some others will take a look and provide constructive comments. Potential for Featured Article? DocTree (talk) 19:22, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review and the edits. Would it be possible to make the gigantic synonym list collapsible, like the one seen at Tyrannosaurus? I've tried, but no success. FunkMonk (talk) 23:25, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Done.DocTree (talk) 22:40, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot! FunkMonk (talk) 04:59, 3 August 2012 (UTC)