Talk:Red warbler/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ucucha 15:13, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

This generally looks quite good; just a few minor things:
 * A range map would be nice (though it is not required for GA status). (Thanks Cas!)
 * I'll see if I can get someone to help me out with that. I don't know how to do them myself! MeegsC | Talk 21:21, 20 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Ref. 1 and 20 are basically the same thing, and it would be nice to unite them into a single ref.
 * Except one is the IUCN website (and is linked in a template that runs the taxobox) and the other is Birdlife International's website. Would you prefer I use the Birdlife International website for both, as it does contain the IUCN status code?  The IUCN website doesn't have the population numbers. MeegsC | Talk 21:21, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Since the IUCN take their assessments for birds from BirdLife International, using BirdLife's website twice seems reasonable. But it's a minor thing. Ucucha 11:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Ucucha 15:13, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the map; I am now passing the article as a GA. Ucucha 11:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review, Ucucha. MeegsC | Talk 12:30, 22 September 2010 (UTC)