Talk:Redding, California

Sunshine hours
3900+ hours of annual sunshine for a place that averages nearly 900mm of annual precipitation must be some kind of joke. Where is the source for this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.22.231.221 (talk) 16:54, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Personal Commentary
We moved to Redding about a year ago for it's natural beauty and what it has to offer.

We are so glad that we moved to Redding and couldn't ask for a better place to call home!

- (anon at 68.186.36.150)

The following external links, probablly, are marketting material of the respecitve sites...  Too specific....
 * 1) Redding California Directory
 * 2) Redding California Forum
 * 3) Redding Linux Users Group
 * 1) Redding and Shasta County Climate, Air Quality,Transportation, and Retail Trade Area Statistics.

Notability of Non-academic learning section
The inclusion of both Code IT and Build It in the list of educational resources is questionable. There was a discussion or something about them awhile back as not relevant and I think they should be again. As to me they are akin to a private dare care or something. Which really shouldn't be listed. The same goes for the "Non-academic learning" section as a whole IMHO. Including the Redding Library entry. It's to broad a category as anything can count as "Non-academic learning." For something to qualify for being listed it should 1. Be an actually educational institution 2. Serve the main or sole purpose of education (of which the library doesn't) 3. Not be a day or after school program (as are Code IT and Build IT). Otherwise it might as well be a list of all the day care centers in Redding and anywhere that teaches a class on anything. Which totally wouldn't work and is not the purpose of the section. Therefore if there are no valid objections I am going to remove the Non-academic learning section all together. All three places mentioned in it could better be listed on WikiVoyage anyway. It's the more appropriate place for them. Or the library could be mentioned in articles prose somewhere. Especially if someone creates a Wikipedia article about it. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:39, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Go ahead. This article has too much unsourced material anyway. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 19:35, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Regarding the Cory Asbury edit
Someone undid user 172.77.18.139's edit on the Redding, California article that added musician Cory Asbury to the notable persons list. He did live in Redding and worked at the base of Bethel music located there. He did, however, move to Michigan after a few years. It's the same as the deceased Roy Rogers--his Wiki article doesn't even mention Redding! So why is he on there? I don't know.

172.77.161.155 (talk) 19:40, 27 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I removed his entry and there's three reasons why it shouldn't be included. First, the Roy Rogers article you cited doesn't mention Redding is because you have the wrong Roy Rogers. Its actually Roy Rogers (guitarist). Which clearly states, along with an SF Gate article it cites, that he was born in Redding. That's why is included. I'll assume in good faith that you didn't intentionally cite the wrong person.


 * Second, Cory Asbury's article doesn't state that he lived in Redding or worked at Bethel Music as your asserting. What it days say is that at sometime in 2016 he "toured with Bethel Music and has also led worship at the Heaven Come Conference" and that "During his tenure there, he led worship during certain services organized at Bethel Church." No where else in his article does it mention Redding. Let alone him living or working there. Also notice that it goes out of its way to say he only led worship during "certain services." It doesn't specify exactly how many, but it was clearly a small amount. Plus, its not even sourced. Even if it was, it would be ridiculous to include everyone who led a few services at Bethel or toured with their musical group as a notable person of Redding. As it would be list everyone who is was signed up to their record label at some point "just because."


 * Third, the list is mainly suppose to be "prominent people" of Redding. Cory Asbury isn't automatically a prominent person of a Redding just because he went to a church there or released a few records with Bethel Music. People like Bill Johnson, Rick Bosetti, and Megan Rapinoe are considered "prominent people" because most people in the area know who they are and people not in the area largely know about their connection to it. Whereas, the vast majority of people both living in Redding probably haven't heard of Cory Asbury and people not from there more then likely don't know or care that he led a few worship services at Bethel. Again, its only mentioned once in his article and its not sourced. So it's not even important to notability in Wikipedia.


 * One more thing worth mentioning is that Bill Johnson is also notable to Redding because Redding is where and why he became notable. He's not a notable person of Weaverville, CA in Wikipedia. Even though he had a church there before becoming the pastor of Bethel, because it wasn't where he became notable. The place didn't have a huge influence on him becoming a prominent pastor at Bethel. With Cory Asbury there's no indication he was influenced at all by Redding in any way what so ever. Let alone by Bethel Church. He was already a musician before he led a few worship services at Bethel and had a few records out by then.Plus, the relationship to the church was extremely short. If he even did anything there in the first place. Again, its not even sourced so there's no way of knowing, but even if it was sourced and true that he led "certain services" there its just to few to matter. Especially with the other reasons he isn't notable or prominent. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:58, 28 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I see, thanks for the info. I did not realize I cited the wrong 'Roy Rogers'. By the way my IP changed but I am the same person as 172.77.161.155 (talk)
 * 50.120.11.40 (talk) 19:20, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Opening description
It mentions the 2022 census, when it should be the 2020 census. 2600:1700:FA30:57E0:74CC:F041:C7D9:B255 (talk) 01:37, 4 September 2022 (UTC)