Talk:Redstone Building

Copyright material
Resolved. New editor intends for wikipedia to have permission to freely use the copied material and is being proded to make amends. The Redstone is a historic building with a long history in the labor movement of San Francisco so article's subject is indeed quite notable even if first draft wasn't licensed or formatted to explain this properly. Benjiboi 05:31, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

What the hell! I wrote the piece this afternoon. I then posted a copy of it to my redstone bulletin website with plans to expand upon it. So the copy that you are concerned about was written by myself to my webpage!

I don't know swat about the process here so how about getting me up to speed before you wipe out the work I did! Kind of kills people's willingness to post if the first thing they do gets destroyed!

My website is www.energy-net.org!

I thought by posting it there was a good way to help develop the larger project that I'm working on as the current building manager of the Redstone Building!!!

As further proof that I'm the original author, go check the post at energy-net.org and you will find the original document that I posted has since moved to its own page and is no longer where it was, on the main page of my redstone building page on my website...

If being the author means I can't post a copy of it on my own webpage. please inform me why this is the case.

As the current building manager for the last 17 years, I have many more resources of which I would like to post, but feel that if I can't retain a copy of the document I posted here on my own web page, then I will have to decide where to post the original whether it is here or on my website.

Energy net author
 * You can post anything you wish here but as you are new the basic explanation is that any material that is potentially copy-protected such as your original work will be removed unless explicit permission is given for wikipedia to use it. And as wikipedia is a free encyclopedia for anyone to use for any purpose there are delete processes that automatically flag copied items that people add to the site. Does that make sense? Benjiboi 07:18, 1 August 2007 (UTC]

Alpha sort tenants list
Hi, My Word edit program isn't working so could someone please alpha-sort the long tenants list at the end of the article? Thank you! Benjiboi 11:26, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * done. Benjiboi 10:07, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

RTA activities
I found link about a grant the RTA got and a benefit for RTA both 2001. Benjiboi 11:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:26, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Redstone Building → Redstone Building (San Francisco) — This isn't he only Redstone Building in the US. I am almost ready to move an article to the name space, from my user space called J.H.C. Petersen’s Sons’ Store which is referred to now as the Redstone Building. C T J F 8 3 chat 21:13, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.


 * Oppose. If the new article is to be titled J.H.C. Petersen’s Sons’ Store, there is no conflict with this article's title.  All that is needed to avoid confusion is a hatnote, which you have already properly added to this article. Station1 (talk) 00:17, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose The fact that there are other Redstone Buildings in the United States (or anywhere else) isn't important.  What matters is whether there are any other articles on Wikipedia about other Redstone Buildings.  There aren't, and any confusion with J.H.C. Petersen’s Sons’ Store has been dealt with by a hatnote.  There seems little point in the proposed move.  If the move does go ahead, it should be in accordance with the guidance at Disambiguation, which states With place-names, if the disambiguating term is a higher-level administrative division, it is often separated using a comma instead of parentheses, as in Windsor, Berkshire. See Naming conventions (geographic names).  Consequently, any move should be to Redstone Building, California, as further set out at Naming conventions (geographic names).  If there were more than one Redstone Building in California, then it would be Redstone Building, San Fransisco.  Skinsmoke (talk) 04:29, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:  C T J F 8 3  chat 21:13, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Lists
Are these long lists helpful? Could we condense them and/or move the lists to a separate page?Warrenking (talk) 14:55, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Redstone Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050307150456/http://www.outnowmag.com:80/augtext2004.html to http://www.outnowmag.com/augtext2004.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 05:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)